HCMA
Price
$10.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
341.38M
SZZL
Price
$10.11
Change
+$0.02 (+0.20%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
315.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCMA vs SZZL

Header iconHCMA vs SZZL Comparison
Open Charts HCMA vs SZZLBanner chart's image
Hcm III Acquisition
Price$10.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$78.03K
Capitalization341.38M
Sizzle Acquisition Corp II
Price$10.11
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
Volume$7.9K
Capitalization315.48M
HCMA vs SZZL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCMA vs. SZZL commentary
Oct 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMA is a Buy and SZZL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HCMA: $10.12 vs. SZZL: $10.11)
Brand notoriety: HCMA and SZZL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCMA: 57% vs. SZZL: 19%
Market capitalization -- HCMA: $341.38M vs. SZZL: $315.48M
HCMA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $341.38M. SZZL’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $315.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.79M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSZZL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HCMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SZZL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SZZL is a better buy in the long-term than HCMA.

Price Growth

HCMA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while SZZL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +76.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +72.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.31% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMA($341M) has a higher market cap than SZZL($315M).
HCMASZZLHCMA / SZZL
Capitalization341M315M108%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTDN/AN/A-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A1.12M-
Total DebtN/A262K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RFDA63.310.20
+0.31%
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advtg ETF
NBH10.280.02
+0.24%
Neuberger Berman Municipal Fund
FPEI19.380.01
+0.04%
First Trust Instl Pref Secs and Inc ETF
RFEU70.92N/A
N/A
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Eurp ETF
HWSM26.92N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Divers Val Fd

SZZL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SZZL has been closely correlated with SZZLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SZZL jumps, then SZZLU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZZL
1D Price
Change %
SZZL100%
+0.20%
SZZLU - SZZL
81%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
ASUUF - SZZL
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - SZZL
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLMF - SZZL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCBF - SZZL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More