HCMA
Price
$10.28
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
346.9M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SZZL
Price
$10.16
Change
+$0.05 (+0.49%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Capitalization
317.67M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCMA vs SZZL

Header iconHCMA vs SZZL Comparison
Open Charts HCMA vs SZZLBanner chart's image
Hcm III Acquisition
Price$10.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Volume$293
Capitalization346.9M
Sizzle Acquisition Corp II
Price$10.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.49%)
Volume$397
Capitalization317.67M
HCMA vs SZZL Comparison Chart in %
SZZL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCMA vs. SZZL commentary
Oct 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMA is a Hold and SZZL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HCMA: $10.28 vs. SZZL: $10.16)
Brand notoriety: HCMA and SZZL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCMA: 0% vs. SZZL: 1%
Market capitalization -- HCMA: $346.9M vs. SZZL: $317.67M
HCMA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $346.9M. SZZL’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $317.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $182.99M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSZZL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HCMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SZZL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HCMA and SZZL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SZZL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SZZL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

HCMA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.13% price change this week, while SZZL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +6.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+6.85% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMA($347M) has a higher market cap than SZZL($318M).
HCMASZZLHCMA / SZZL
Capitalization347M318M109%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTDN/AN/A-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A1.12M-
Total DebtN/A262K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SZZL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
3%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SZZL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIXPF9.91N/A
N/A
Caixabank SA
DAUGF0.05N/A
N/A
Desert Gold Ventures Inc.
KMMPF12.65N/A
N/A
Killiam Apt Real Estate Invt Tr
MSMKF17.77N/A
N/A
Matsumotokiyoshi Holdings Co., Ltd.
OMHLF0.17N/A
N/A
OM Holdings Ltd.

HCMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMA has been loosely correlated with NPWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCMA jumps, then NPWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMA
1D Price
Change %
HCMA100%
-0.16%
NPWR - HCMA
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.23%
HCMAU - HCMA
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
WELNF - HCMA
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - HCMA
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SZZL - HCMA
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SZZL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SZZL has been closely correlated with SZZLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SZZL jumps, then SZZLU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZZL
1D Price
Change %
SZZL100%
N/A
SZZLU - SZZL
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
ASUUF - SZZL
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - SZZL
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLMF - SZZL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCBF - SZZL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More