HCMAU
Price
$10.13
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
LWAC
Price
$9.98
Change
+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
300.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCMAU vs LWAC

Header iconHCMAU vs LWAC Comparison
Open Charts HCMAU vs LWACBanner chart's image
Hcm III Acquisition
Price$10.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$44.56K
CapitalizationN/A
LightWave Acquisition
Price$9.98
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Volume$1.02K
Capitalization300.15M
HCMAU vs LWAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCMAU vs. LWAC commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMAU is a StrongBuy and LWAC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HCMAU: $10.13 vs. LWAC: $9.98)
Brand notoriety: HCMAU and LWAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCMAU: 8% vs. LWAC: 1%
Market capitalization -- HCMAU: $0 vs. LWAC: $300.15M
HCMAU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. LWAC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $300.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $171.71M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCMAU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLWAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HCMAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LWAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HCMAU and LWAC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

HCMAU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while LWAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.15% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMAULWACHCMAU / LWAC
CapitalizationN/A300M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTDN/AN/A-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FITE80.940.78
+0.97%
SPDR® S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
PPLT124.051.07
+0.87%
abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF
AGGH20.670.07
+0.34%
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
IVRS41.51N/A
N/A
iShares Future Metaverse Tec And Com ETF
AMDD13.98-0.13
-0.91%
Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares

HCMAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMAU has been loosely correlated with PLMIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCMAU jumps, then PLMIU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMAU
1D Price
Change %
HCMAU100%
-0.05%
PLMIU - HCMAU
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FACT - HCMAU
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMCAF - HCMAU
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DYCQ - HCMAU
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SZZLU - HCMAU
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
More

LWAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LWAC and LEGT have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LWAC and LEGT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LWAC
1D Price
Change %
LWAC100%
+0.10%
LEGT - LWAC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
NHICU - LWAC
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
FACT - LWAC
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - LWAC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMAU - LWAC
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
More