Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMDX vs RGABX
HCMDX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts HCMDX vs RGABX
HCM Tactical Plus Investor
Price$31.56
Change-$0.28 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.57
Change-$0.51 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
HCMDX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMDX vs. RGABX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMDX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. HCMDX (2.03B). HCMDX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . HCMDX was incepted earlier than RGABX: HCMDX (11 years) vs RGABX (23 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: RGABX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). HCMDX (13.31) and RGABX (13.25) have marching annual gain over last year. HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 69.36 vs. RGABX (34.72).
| HCMDX | RGABX | HCMDX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 1.39 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 1.39 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.035 | 18.293 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 343B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.31 | 13.25 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.91 | 68.35 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.36 | 34.72 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 251.82 | 87.25 | 289% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement