HCMLF
Price
$74.68
Change
+$1.53 (+2.09%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
39.08B
HCMLY
Price
$24.47
Change
+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
39.08B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCMLF vs HCMLY

Header iconHCMLF vs HCMLY Comparison
Open Charts HCMLF vs HCMLYBanner chart's image
HOLCIM
Price$74.68
Change+$1.53 (+2.09%)
Volume$14.19K
Capitalization39.08B
HOLCIM
Price$24.47
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Volume$55.94K
Capitalization39.08B
HCMLF vs HCMLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HCMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCMLF vs. HCMLY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To understand the difference between Holcim Ltd (HCMLF) vs. Holcim Ltd - ADR (HCMLY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HCMLF: $74.68 vs. HCMLY: $24.47)
Brand notoriety: HCMLF and HCMLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCMLF: 301% vs. HCMLY: 57%
Market capitalization -- HCMLF: $39.08B vs. HCMLY: $39.08B
HCMLF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $39.08B. HCMLY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $39.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HCMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCMLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLY is a better buy in the long-term than HCMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCMLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCMLY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCMLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HCMLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLF is a better buy in the short-term than HCMLY.

Price Growth

HCMLF (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.46% price change this week, while HCMLY (@Construction Materials) price change was -0.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCMLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.80% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLF($39.1B) and HCMLY($39.1B) have the same market capitalization . HCMLF (10.44) and HCMLY (10.41) have similar P/E ratio . HCMLF YTD gains are higher at: 48.197 vs. HCMLY (32.046). HCMLF (7.78B) and HCMLY (7.78B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . HCMLF (3.65B) and HCMLY (3.65B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . HCMLF (27.6B) and HCMLY (27.6B) have equivalent revenues.
HCMLFHCMLYHCMLF / HCMLY
Capitalization39.1B39.1B100%
EBITDA7.78B7.78B100%
Gain YTD48.19732.046150%
P/E Ratio10.4410.41100%
Revenue27.6B27.6B100%
Total Cash3.65B3.65B100%
Total Debt14.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCMLF vs HCMLY: Fundamental Ratings
HCMLF
HCMLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
414
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCMLF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLY (13). This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCMLF (41). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLF (98). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLY (41). This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCMLF (80). This means that HCMLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCMLFHCMLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAOI28.661.97
+7.38%
Applied Optoelectronics
DT56.541.87
+3.42%
Dynatrace
IBRX2.720.08
+3.03%
ImmunityBio
CHSN0.13N/A
+1.97%
Chanson International Holding
TNYA0.61N/A
N/A
Tenaya Therapeutics

HCMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCMLF and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCMLF and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLF
1D Price
Change %
HCMLF100%
+2.09%
HCMLY - HCMLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
JHX - HCMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
HDLMY - HCMLF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
CRH - HCMLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
CX - HCMLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
More

HCMLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMLY has been closely correlated with HDLMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCMLY jumps, then HDLMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLY
1D Price
Change %
HCMLY100%
+0.08%
HDLMY - HCMLY
67%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
CRH - HCMLY
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
EXP - HCMLY
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
VMC - HCMLY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
MLM - HCMLY
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More