HCMLF
Price
$94.33
Change
+$0.40 (+0.43%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
39.08B
HDLMY
Price
$26.52
Change
+$0.62 (+2.39%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
15.13B
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HCMLF vs HDLMY

Header iconHCMLF vs HDLMY Comparison
Open Charts HCMLF vs HDLMYBanner chart's image
HOLCIM
Price$94.33
Change+$0.40 (+0.43%)
Volume$2.15K
Capitalization39.08B
HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG
Price$26.52
Change+$0.62 (+2.39%)
Volume$21.72K
Capitalization15.13B
HCMLF vs HDLMY Comparison Chart
Loading...
HCMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HDLMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCMLF vs. HDLMY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMLF is a Hold and HDLMY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (HCMLF: $94.33 vs. HDLMY: $26.52)
Brand notoriety: HCMLF and HDLMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCMLF: 561% vs. HDLMY: 18%
Market capitalization -- HCMLF: $39.08B vs. HDLMY: $15.13B
HCMLF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $39.08B. HDLMY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $15.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCMLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHDLMY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HCMLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HDLMY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HDLMY is a better buy in the long-term than HCMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCMLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HDLMY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCMLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HDLMY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HCMLF and HDLMY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HCMLF (@Construction Materials) experienced а +0.62% price change this week, while HDLMY (@Construction Materials) price change was +2.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

HDLMY is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.68% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLF($39.1B) has a higher market cap than HDLMY($15.1B). HCMLF has higher P/E ratio than HDLMY: HCMLF (10.44) vs HDLMY (8.75). HDLMY YTD gains are higher at: 9.091 vs. HCMLF (-3.597). HCMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.78B vs. HDLMY (3.77B). HCMLF has higher revenues than HDLMY: HCMLF (27.6B) vs HDLMY (21.1B).
HCMLFHDLMYHCMLF / HDLMY
Capitalization39.1B15.1B259%
EBITDA7.78B3.77B206%
Gain YTD-3.5979.091-40%
P/E Ratio10.448.75119%
Revenue27.6B21.1B131%
Total Cash3.65BN/A-
Total Debt14.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCMLF vs HDLMY: Fundamental Ratings
HCMLF
HDLMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2220
SMR RATING
1..100
9896
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4820
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCMLF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as HDLMY (13). This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to HDLMY’s over the last 12 months.

HDLMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLF (22). This means that HDLMY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HDLMY's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLF (98). This means that HDLMY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HDLMY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLF (51). This means that HDLMY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HDLMY's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLF (48). This means that HDLMY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCMLFHDLMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
41%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HCMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HDLMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PALL87.211.05
+1.22%
abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF
XSOE30.580.26
+0.86%
WisdomTree EmMkts ex-Stt-Ownd EntrprsETF
BDCX32.560.11
+0.33%
ETRACS Qrtly Py 1.5X Lvgd Wls Fg BDC ETN
SUPL37.81N/A
N/A
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
IYLD19.68-0.01
-0.05%
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Inc ETF

HCMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCMLF and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCMLF and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLF
1D Price
Change %
HCMLF100%
+0.43%
HCMLY - HCMLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
JHX - HCMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
HDLMY - HCMLF
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
CRH - HCMLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
CX - HCMLF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
More

HDLMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HDLMY has been closely correlated with HCMLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HDLMY jumps, then HCMLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HDLMY
1D Price
Change %
HDLMY100%
+2.39%
HCMLY - HDLMY
67%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
CRH - HDLMY
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
SUM - HDLMY
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VMC - HDLMY
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
MLM - HDLMY
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
More