HCMLF
Price
$102.18
Change
+$5.68 (+5.89%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
39.08B
HDLMY
Price
$36.70
Change
+$4.48 (+13.90%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
15.13B
28 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HCMLF vs HDLMY

Header iconHCMLF vs HDLMY Comparison
Open Charts HCMLF vs HDLMYBanner chart's image
HOLCIM
Price$102.18
Change+$5.68 (+5.89%)
Volume$2.25K
Capitalization39.08B
HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG
Price$36.70
Change+$4.48 (+13.90%)
Volume$196.49K
Capitalization15.13B
HCMLF vs HDLMY Comparison Chart
Loading...
HDLMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCMLF vs. HDLMY commentary
Apr 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMLF is a Hold and HDLMY is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2025
Stock price -- (HCMLF: $102.18 vs. HDLMY: $36.70)
Brand notoriety: HCMLF and HDLMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCMLF: 28% vs. HDLMY: 101%
Market capitalization -- HCMLF: $39.08B vs. HDLMY: $15.13B
HCMLF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $39.08B. HDLMY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $15.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCMLF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHDLMY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HCMLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HDLMY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HDLMY is a better buy in the long-term than HCMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HDLMY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HDLMY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

HCMLF (@Construction Materials) experienced а -5.21% price change this week, while HDLMY (@Construction Materials) price change was +2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

HDLMY is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.90% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLF($39.1B) has a higher market cap than HDLMY($15.1B). HCMLF has higher P/E ratio than HDLMY: HCMLF (10.44) vs HDLMY (8.75). HDLMY YTD gains are higher at: 50.967 vs. HCMLF (4.427). HCMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.78B vs. HDLMY (3.77B). HCMLF has higher revenues than HDLMY: HCMLF (27.6B) vs HDLMY (21.1B).
HCMLFHDLMYHCMLF / HDLMY
Capitalization39.1B15.1B259%
EBITDA7.78B3.77B206%
Gain YTD4.42750.9679%
P/E Ratio10.448.75119%
Revenue27.6B21.1B131%
Total Cash3.65BN/A-
Total Debt14.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCMLF vs HDLMY: Fundamental Ratings
HCMLF
HDLMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8484
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
9997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
277
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCMLF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as HDLMY (16). This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to HDLMY’s over the last 12 months.

HDLMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLF (6). This means that HDLMY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HDLMY's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLF (99). This means that HDLMY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HDLMY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLF (56). This means that HDLMY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HDLMY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as HCMLF (27). This means that HDLMY’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HDLMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HDLMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSPT33.183.66
+12.40%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Tech ETF
PSIL10.570.63
+6.38%
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
JULW33.971.49
+4.58%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF
CNBS14.800.58
+4.10%
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
EWH15.790.59
+3.88%
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF

HCMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCMLF and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCMLF and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLF
1D Price
Change %
HCMLF100%
+5.89%
HCMLY - HCMLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+8.83%
JHX - HCMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+14.45%
HDLMY - HCMLF
17%
Poorly correlated
+13.90%
CRH - HCMLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+10.80%
CX - HCMLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.92%
More

HDLMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HDLMY has been closely correlated with HCMLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HDLMY jumps, then HCMLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HDLMY
1D Price
Change %
HDLMY100%
+13.90%
HCMLY - HDLMY
67%
Closely correlated
+8.83%
CRH - HDLMY
56%
Loosely correlated
+10.80%
SUM - HDLMY
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VMC - HDLMY
48%
Loosely correlated
+5.76%
MLM - HDLMY
48%
Loosely correlated
+6.44%
More