HCMLY
Price
$27.03
Change
+$0.45 (+1.69%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
39.08B
4 days until earnings call
MLM
Price
$581.44
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
37.96B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCMLY vs MLM

Header iconHCMLY vs MLM Comparison
Open Charts HCMLY vs MLMBanner chart's image
HOLCIM
Price$27.03
Change+$0.45 (+1.69%)
Volume$69.56K
Capitalization39.08B
Martin Marietta Materials
Price$581.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$62
Capitalization37.96B
HCMLY vs MLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCMLY vs. MLM commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMLY is a StrongBuy and MLM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HCMLY: $27.03 vs. MLM: $581.44)
Brand notoriety: HCMLY and MLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCMLY: 80% vs. MLM: 0%
Market capitalization -- HCMLY: $39.08B vs. MLM: $37.96B
HCMLY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $39.08B. MLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $37.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCMLY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMLM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HCMLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLY is a better buy in the long-term than MLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCMLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCMLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MLM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the short-term than HCMLY.

Price Growth

HCMLY (@Construction Materials) experienced а +2.70% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +2.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCMLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

MLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.18% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLY($39.1B) and MLM($38B) have the same market capitalization . MLM has higher P/E ratio than HCMLY: MLM (31.28) vs HCMLY (10.41). HCMLY YTD gains are higher at: 45.861 vs. MLM (12.920). HCMLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.78B vs. MLM (2.17B). HCMLY has more cash in the bank: 3.65B vs. MLM (1.27B). HCMLY has higher revenues than MLM: HCMLY (27.6B) vs MLM (6.78B).
HCMLYMLMHCMLY / MLM
Capitalization39.1B38B103%
EBITDA7.78B2.17B358%
Gain YTD45.86112.920355%
P/E Ratio10.4131.2833%
Revenue27.6B6.78B407%
Total Cash3.65B1.27B287%
Total DebtN/A4.73B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCMLY vs MLM: Fundamental Ratings
HCMLY
MLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
869
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
315
SMR RATING
1..100
9862
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4229
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
249
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCMLY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (86) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MLM (15) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's SMR Rating (62) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCMLY (98) in the null industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as HCMLY (42) in the null industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as HCMLY (24) in the null industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCMLYMLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFA20.990.08
+0.38%
First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund
RFDI74.310.03
+0.05%
First Trust RiverFront Dyn Dev Intl ETF
KONG30.27N/A
N/A
Formidable Fortress ETF
USCA39.76N/A
N/A
Xtrackers MSCI USA Clmt Actn Eq ETF
USAF26.63N/A
N/A
Atlas America Fund

HCMLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMLY has been closely correlated with HDLMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCMLY jumps, then HDLMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLY
1D Price
Change %
HCMLY100%
+1.69%
HDLMY - HCMLY
67%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
CRH - HCMLY
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.97%
EXP - HCMLY
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.81%
VMC - HCMLY
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
MLM - HCMLY
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More