Ad is loading...
HCOW vs IJJ
HCOW vs IJJ Comparison
Open Charts HCOW vs IJJ
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
Price$22.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
Volume$100
Net Assets10.11M
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
Price$122.03
Change-$0.22 (-0.18%)
Volume$100
Net Assets7.74B
HCOW vs IJJ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCOW vs. IJJ commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCOW is a StrongBuy and IJJ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IJJ has more net assets: 7.74B vs. HCOW (10.1M). IJJ has a higher annual dividend yield than HCOW: IJJ (-1.806) vs HCOW (-8.653). HCOW was incepted earlier than IJJ: HCOW (2 years) vs IJJ (25 years). IJJ (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than HCOW (0.65). IJJ has a higher turnover HCOW (0.00) vs HCOW (0.00).
| HCOW | IJJ | HCOW / IJJ | |
| Gain YTD | -8.653 | -1.806 | 479% |
| Net Assets | 10.1M | 7.74B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.18 | 361% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 42.00 | - |
| Yield | 9.90 | 2.05 | 484% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HCOW | IJJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HCOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCOW has been closely correlated with HAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCOW jumps, then HAL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCOW | 100% | -2.25% | ||
| HAL - HCOW | 79% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| TXT - HCOW | 78% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| SLB - HCOW | 78% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| MGY - HCOW | 77% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| BC - HCOW | 77% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||