HCXLF
Price
$17.20
Change
+$0.20 (+1.18%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
5.92B
38 days until earnings call
LMND
Price
$51.42
Change
-$1.04 (-1.98%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.88B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCXLF vs LMND

Header iconHCXLF vs LMND Comparison
Open Charts HCXLF vs LMNDBanner chart's image
Hiscox
Price$17.20
Change+$0.20 (+1.18%)
Volume$500
Capitalization5.92B
Lemonade
Price$51.42
Change-$1.04 (-1.98%)
Volume$5.31K
Capitalization3.88B
HCXLF vs LMND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HCXLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCXLF vs. LMND commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCXLF is a Buy and LMND is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HCXLF: $17.20 vs. LMND: $52.46)
Brand notoriety: HCXLF and LMND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCXLF: 59% vs. LMND: 122%
Market capitalization -- HCXLF: $5.92B vs. LMND: $3.88B
HCXLF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $5.92B. LMND’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $3.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $142.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCXLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLMND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HCXLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LMND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCXLF is a better buy in the long-term than LMND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCXLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMND’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCXLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • LMND’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HCXLF is a better buy in the short-term than LMND.

Price Growth

HCXLF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LMND (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -8.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCXLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

LMND is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.01% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCXLF($5.92B) has a higher market cap than LMND($3.88B). LMND YTD gains are higher at: 43.021 vs. HCXLF (26.466). HCXLF has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. LMND (670M). LMND has less debt than HCXLF: LMND (144M) vs HCXLF (875M). HCXLF has higher revenues than LMND: HCXLF (3.84B) vs LMND (601M).
HCXLFLMNDHCXLF / LMND
Capitalization5.92B3.88B153%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.46643.02162%
P/E Ratio10.09N/A-
Revenue3.84B601M639%
Total Cash1.31B670M196%
Total Debt875M144M608%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCXLF: Fundamental Ratings
HCXLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
48
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
69
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCXLFLMND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCXLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRKZX7.79N/A
N/A
PGIM Real Estate Income Z
PAEAX22.24N/A
N/A
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr A
SEEKX39.12N/A
N/A
Steward Values Enhanced Lg Cap A
SESLX33.07N/A
N/A
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced C
GBLCX40.58-0.23
-0.56%
American Funds Global Balanced C

HCXLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCXLF and AMIGF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCXLF and AMIGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCXLF
1D Price
Change %
HCXLF100%
N/A
AMIGF - HCXLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMIGY - HCXLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
GJNSF - HCXLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMND - HCXLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
PLMR - HCXLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
More

LMND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMND has been loosely correlated with ROOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMND jumps, then ROOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMND
1D Price
Change %
LMND100%
-1.82%
ROOT - LMND
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
HIPO - LMND
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
BNT - LMND
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
UFCS - LMND
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
TRUP - LMND
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
More