HDALF
Price
$1.65
Change
-$0.03 (-1.79%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
8.74B
HLFFF
Price
$9.14
Change
-$0.55 (-5.68%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HDALF vs HLFFF

Header iconHDALF vs HLFFF Comparison
Open Charts HDALF vs HLFFFBanner chart's image
Haidilao International
Price$1.65
Change-$0.03 (-1.79%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.74B
Hellofresh SE
Price$9.14
Change-$0.55 (-5.68%)
Volume$1.03K
Capitalization1.39B
HDALF vs HLFFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HDALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HDALF vs. HLFFF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDALF is a Buy and HLFFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HDALF: $1.63 vs. HLFFF: $8.50)
Brand notoriety: HDALF and HLFFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HDALF: 360% vs. HLFFF: 95%
Market capitalization -- HDALF: $8.74B vs. HLFFF: $1.39B
HDALF [@Restaurants] is valued at $8.74B. HLFFF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $215.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HDALF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLFFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HDALF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLFFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HDALF is a better buy in the long-term than HLFFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HDALF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLFFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HDALF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HLFFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HDALF is a better buy in the short-term than HLFFF.

Price Growth

HDALF (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.62% price change this week, while HLFFF (@Restaurants) price change was -12.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.37% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HDALF($8.74B) has a higher market cap than HLFFF($1.39B). HLFFF has higher P/E ratio than HDALF: HLFFF (67.46) vs HDALF (14.31). HDALF YTD gains are higher at: -25.909 vs. HLFFF (-28.511).
HDALFHLFFFHDALF / HLFFF
Capitalization8.74B1.39B628%
EBITDAN/A316M-
Gain YTD-25.909-28.51191%
P/E Ratio14.3167.4621%
RevenueN/A7.27B-
Total CashN/A446M-
Total DebtN/A742M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HDALF vs HLFFF: Fundamental Ratings
HDALF
HLFFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3470
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6211
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HDALF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLFFF (75). This means that HDALF’s stock grew significantly faster than HLFFF’s over the last 12 months.

HDALF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HLFFF (100). This means that HDALF’s stock grew similarly to HLFFF’s over the last 12 months.

HLFFF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as HDALF (97). This means that HLFFF’s stock grew similarly to HDALF’s over the last 12 months.

HLFFF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as HDALF (64). This means that HLFFF’s stock grew similarly to HDALF’s over the last 12 months.

HLFFF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HDALF (62). This means that HLFFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HDALF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HDALFHLFFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HDALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EINC99.391.28
+1.31%
VanEck Energy Income ETF
NFLT23.100.08
+0.35%
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sect Bd ETF
VGUS75.610.01
+0.01%
Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF
DFSU41.92-0.26
-0.61%
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF
BMED25.79-0.37
-1.41%
iShares Health Innovation Active ETF

HDALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HDALF and LKNCY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HDALF and LKNCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HDALF
1D Price
Change %
HDALF100%
-1.21%
LKNCY - HDALF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
MARZF - HDALF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFFF - HDALF
6%
Poorly correlated
-7.00%
JDWPF - HDALF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGGSF - HDALF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLFFF has been loosely correlated with HELFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLFFF jumps, then HELFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLFFF
1D Price
Change %
HLFFF100%
-7.00%
HELFY - HLFFF
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
LKNCY - HLFFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
HDALF - HLFFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
GGGSF - HLFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JDWPY - HLFFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More