HDVTY
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.07 (-63.64%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Capitalization
40.69M
MAKSF
Price
$3.80
Change
-$0.25 (-6.17%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
8.27B
Ad is loading...

HDVTY vs MAKSF

Header iconHDVTY vs MAKSF Comparison
Open Charts HDVTY vs MAKSFBanner chart's image
Henderson Investment
Price$0.04
Change-$0.07 (-63.64%)
Volume$2.03K
Capitalization40.69M
Marks & Spencer Group
Price$3.80
Change-$0.25 (-6.17%)
Volume$800
Capitalization8.27B
HDVTY vs MAKSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HDVTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAKSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HDVTY vs. MAKSF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDVTY is a Hold and MAKSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (HDVTY: $0.04 vs. MAKSF: $3.80)
Brand notoriety: HDVTY and MAKSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HDVTY: 189% vs. MAKSF: 33%
Market capitalization -- HDVTY: $40.69M vs. MAKSF: $8.27B
HDVTY [@Department Stores] is valued at $40.69M. MAKSF’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $8.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $4.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HDVTY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAKSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HDVTY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAKSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HDVTY is a better buy in the long-term than MAKSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HDVTY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAKSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HDVTY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MAKSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HDVTY is a better buy in the short-term than MAKSF.

Price Growth

HDVTY (@Department Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MAKSF (@Department Stores) price change was -7.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (-1.21% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAKSF($8.27B) has a higher market cap than HDVTY($40.7M). HDVTY YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. MAKSF (-17.740). MAKSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.43B vs. HDVTY (245M). MAKSF has higher revenues than HDVTY: MAKSF (13.4B) vs HDVTY (1.55B).
HDVTYMAKSFHDVTY / MAKSF
Capitalization40.7M8.27B0%
EBITDA245M1.43B17%
Gain YTD0.000-17.740-
P/E RatioN/A12.83-
Revenue1.55B13.4B12%
Total CashN/A780M-
Total DebtN/A2.88B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HDVTY vs MAKSF: Fundamental Ratings
HDVTY
MAKSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
9390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9064
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
261
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HDVTY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAKSF (38). This means that HDVTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAKSF’s over the last 12 months.

MAKSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HDVTY (100). This means that MAKSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HDVTY’s over the last 12 months.

MAKSF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as HDVTY (93). This means that MAKSF’s stock grew similarly to HDVTY’s over the last 12 months.

MAKSF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as HDVTY (90). This means that MAKSF’s stock grew similarly to HDVTY’s over the last 12 months.

HDVTY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAKSF (61). This means that HDVTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAKSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HDVTYMAKSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HDVTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAKSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSI63.641.41
+2.27%
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
DUBS32.970.32
+0.98%
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
TGLR30.650.24
+0.79%
LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF
TPHE25.930.15
+0.58%
Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock Enh ETF
BBCA71.110.30
+0.42%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF

HDVTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HDVTY and AONNY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HDVTY and AONNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HDVTY
1D Price
Change %
HDVTY100%
N/A
AONNY - HDVTY
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
MAKSF - HDVTY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBDBY - HDVTY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSS - HDVTY
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
DDS - HDVTY
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.59%
More

MAKSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAKSF and DDS have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAKSF and DDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAKSF
1D Price
Change %
MAKSF100%
N/A
DDS - MAKSF
15%
Poorly correlated
+3.59%
JWN - MAKSF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
KSS - MAKSF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
HDVTY - MAKSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
M - MAKSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
More