HELOF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.02 (+50.00%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.34M
KGLDF
Price
$0.65
Change
-$0.01 (-1.52%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HELOF vs KGLDF

Header iconHELOF vs KGLDF Comparison
Open Charts HELOF vs KGLDFBanner chart's image
WINSHEAR GOLD
Price$0.06
Change+$0.02 (+50.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization3.34M
King Global Ventures
Price$0.65
Change-$0.01 (-1.52%)
Volume$74.8K
Capitalization1.16M
HELOF vs KGLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HELOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HELOF vs. KGLDF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HELOF is a Hold and KGLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (HELOF: $0.06 vs. KGLDF: $0.65)
Brand notoriety: HELOF and KGLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HELOF: 146% vs. KGLDF: 151%
Market capitalization -- HELOF: $3.34M vs. KGLDF: $1.16M
HELOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.34M. KGLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HELOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKGLDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HELOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HELOF and KGLDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HELOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGLDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HELOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • KGLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HELOF is a better buy in the short-term than KGLDF.

Price Growth

HELOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.43% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HELOF($3.34M) has a higher market cap than KGLDF($1.16M). KGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 133.750 vs. HELOF (-33.333). HELOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.15M vs. KGLDF (-1.42M). HELOF has more cash in the bank: 588K vs. KGLDF (114K). HELOF (0) and KGLDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
HELOFKGLDFHELOF / KGLDF
Capitalization3.34M1.16M287%
EBITDA-1.15M-1.42M81%
Gain YTD-33.333133.750-25%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash588K114K516%
Total DebtN/A41.5K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HELOF vs KGLDF: Fundamental Ratings
HELOF
KGLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4289
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8235
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HELOF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (62). This means that HELOF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

HELOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (100). This means that HELOF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

HELOF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (98). This means that HELOF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KGLDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HELOF (82). This means that KGLDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HELOF’s over the last 12 months.

HELOF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGLDF (100). This means that HELOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HELOFKGLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HELOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFBS82.981.76
+2.17%
ServisFirst Bancshares
STHO7.840.06
+0.77%
Star Holdings
TLPH0.43N/A
N/A
Talphera
BLND3.52N/A
N/A
Blend Labs
TCOM62.32-0.71
-1.13%
Trip.com Group Limited

HELOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HELOF has been loosely correlated with KGSSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HELOF jumps, then KGSSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HELOF
1D Price
Change %
HELOF100%
N/A
KGSSF - HELOF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RMETF - HELOF
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
KGLDF - HELOF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
JUPGF - HELOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+41.10%
IMRFF - HELOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGLDF and HELOF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGLDF and HELOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGLDF
1D Price
Change %
KGLDF100%
-0.88%
HELOF - KGLDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NIOVF - KGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
SUNPF - KGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-18.83%
KGSSF - KGLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAGGF - KGLDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
More