Ad is loading...
HEMSX vs RNWAX
HEMSX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts HEMSX vs RNWAX
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets S
Price$9.27
Change+$0.06 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.3M
American Funds New World R1
Price$75.16
Change+$0.82 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.47B
HEMSX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEMSX vs. RNWAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEMSX is a StrongBuy and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 61.5B vs. HEMSX (32.3M). HEMSX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: HEMSX (0.02) vs RNWAX (0.00). HEMSX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: HEMSX (8 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). HEMSX (5.98) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). HEMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEMSX: RNWAX (250) vs HEMSX (2500). RNWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.61 vs. HEMSX (1.01). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.36 vs. HEMSX (21.58).
| HEMSX | RNWAX | HEMSX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.66 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.98 | 1.66 | 360% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.074 | 2.078 | -52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3M | 61.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.01 | 1.61 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.10 | 10.94 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.58 | 34.36 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...