Ad is loading...
HEMSX vs RNWAX
HEMSX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts HEMSX vs RNWAX
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets S
Price$9.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.32M
American Funds New World R1
Price$75.27
Change+$0.20 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.88B
HEMSX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEMSX vs. RNWAX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEMSX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 61.9B vs. HEMSX (31.3M). HEMSX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: HEMSX (0.02) vs RNWAX (0.00). HEMSX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: HEMSX (8 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). HEMSX (5.98) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). HEMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEMSX: RNWAX (250) vs HEMSX (2500). HEMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.98 vs. RNWAX (-0.03). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.87 vs. HEMSX (35.03).
| HEMSX | RNWAX | HEMSX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.66 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.98 | 1.66 | 360% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.611 | 2.227 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.3M | 61.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.98 | -0.03 | -3,695% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.24 | 1.77 | -352% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.03 | 47.87 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...