HEPS
Price
$2.51
Change
-$0.01 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
818.26M
YJ
Price
$1.83
Change
-$0.06 (-3.17%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HEPS vs YJ

Header iconHEPS vs YJ Comparison
Open Charts HEPS vs YJBanner chart's image
D-Market Electronic Services & Trading
Price$2.51
Change-$0.01 (-0.40%)
Volume$710.52K
Capitalization818.26M
Yunji
Price$1.83
Change-$0.06 (-3.17%)
Volume$3.38K
Capitalization9.02M
HEPS vs YJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HEPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YJ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HEPS vs. YJ commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEPS is a Hold and YJ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HEPS: $2.51 vs. YJ: $1.83)
Brand notoriety: HEPS and YJ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HEPS: 178% vs. YJ: 11%
Market capitalization -- HEPS: $818.26M vs. YJ: $9.02M
HEPS [@Internet Retail] is valued at $818.26M. YJ’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $9.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.46T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $48.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HEPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYJ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HEPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YJ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, YJ is a better buy in the long-term than HEPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HEPS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YJ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HEPS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • YJ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YJ is a better buy in the short-term than HEPS.

Price Growth

HEPS (@Internet Retail) experienced а -3.46% price change this week, while YJ (@Internet Retail) price change was -5.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +70.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +101.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

HEPS is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

YJ is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+2.15% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HEPS($818M) has a higher market cap than YJ($9.02M). YJ YTD gains are higher at: 13.702 vs. HEPS (-17.162). HEPS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.18B vs. YJ (-166.91M). HEPS has more cash in the bank: 7.29B vs. YJ (244M). YJ has less debt than HEPS: YJ (13.9M) vs HEPS (2.75B). HEPS has higher revenues than YJ: HEPS (55.8B) vs YJ (470M).
HEPSYJHEPS / YJ
Capitalization818M9.02M9,072%
EBITDA3.18B-166.91M-1,905%
Gain YTD-17.16213.702-125%
P/E Ratio106.20N/A-
Revenue55.8B470M11,872%
Total Cash7.29B244M2,989%
Total Debt2.75B13.9M19,770%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YJ: Fundamental Ratings
YJ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HEPSYJ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HEPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YJ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IALAX43.920.43
+0.99%
Transamerica Capital Growth A
DSMLX67.200.30
+0.45%
Touchstone Large Company Growth Instl
FCUDX20.110.08
+0.40%
NYLI PineStone U.S. Equity Class R6
TRZKX75.820.17
+0.22%
T. Rowe Price International Discovery Z
HUMDX16.11-0.02
-0.12%
Huber Mid Cap Value Inv

HEPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HEPS has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HEPS jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HEPS
1D Price
Change %
HEPS100%
-0.40%
CVNA - HEPS
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
AMZN - HEPS
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
ZKH - HEPS
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
OCG - HEPS
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.76%
BZUN - HEPS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
More

YJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YJ and AMZN have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YJ and AMZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YJ
1D Price
Change %
YJ100%
-3.15%
AMZN - YJ
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
RERE - YJ
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
MI - YJ
21%
Poorly correlated
+19.74%
HEPS - YJ
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
MELI - YJ
19%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
More