Ad is loading...
HFAAX vs TNBMX
HFAAX vs TNBMX Comparison
Open Charts HFAAX vs TNBMX
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond A
Price$7.71
Change+$0.02 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets707.17M
T. Rowe Price Intl Bd (USD Hdgd) I
Price$8.53
Change+$0.02 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.61B
HFAAX vs TNBMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFAAX vs. TNBMX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFAAX is a Hold and TNBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNBMX has more cash in the bank: 6.61B vs. HFAAX (707M). TNBMX pays higher dividends than HFAAX: TNBMX (3.23) vs HFAAX (3.07). HFAAX was incepted earlier than TNBMX: HFAAX (22 years) vs TNBMX (8 years). HFAAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than TNBMX (0.53). TNBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.50 vs. HFAAX (29.00). HFAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBMX: HFAAX (2500) vs TNBMX (500000). HFAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.86 vs. TNBMX (5.28). HFAAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.96 vs. TNBMX (-3.64).
| HFAAX | TNBMX | HFAAX / TNBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.53 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.53 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.298 | 0.658 | 45% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 707M | 6.61B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 3.23 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.86 | 5.28 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.60 | -1.06 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.96 | -3.64 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers