Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFAFX vs TRIGX
HFAFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFAFX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val R5
Price$16.50
Change-$0.11 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.18M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.92
Change-$0.21 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.55B
HFAFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.5B vs. HFAFX (153M). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFAFX: TRIGX (1.91) vs HFAFX (1.33). HFAFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFAFX (2 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFAFX (1.48) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFAFX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.11 vs. HFAFX (23.51).
| HFAFX | TRIGX | HFAFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.87 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.87 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.931 | 36.139 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 16.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.91 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.51 | 28.11 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 106.36 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 106.76 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement