HFAHF
Price
$1.35
Change
+$0.27 (+24.77%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
678.99M
QUCT
Price
$1970.00
Change
+$35.00 (+1.81%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
92.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HFAHF vs QUCT

Header iconHFAHF vs QUCT Comparison
Open Charts HFAHF vs QUCTBanner chart's image
Navigator Global Invts
Price$1.35
Change+$0.27 (+24.77%)
Volume$22.5K
Capitalization678.99M
Queen City Investments
Price$1970.00
Change+$35.00 (+1.81%)
Volume$1
Capitalization92.06M
HFAHF vs QUCT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HFAHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUCT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HFAHF vs. QUCT commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFAHF is a Hold and QUCT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HFAHF: $1.33 vs. QUCT: $1970.00)
Brand notoriety: HFAHF and QUCT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HFAHF: 108% vs. QUCT: 29%
Market capitalization -- HFAHF: $678.99M vs. QUCT: $92.06M
HFAHF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $678.99M. QUCT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $92.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HFAHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQUCT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HFAHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QUCT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HFAHF is a better buy in the long-term than QUCT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HFAHF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUCT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HFAHF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QUCT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QUCT is a better buy in the short-term than HFAHF.

Price Growth

HFAHF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QUCT (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.99% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFAHF($679M) has a higher market cap than QUCT($92.1M). QUCT YTD gains are higher at: 45.926 vs. HFAHF (15.812).
HFAHFQUCTHFAHF / QUCT
Capitalization679M92.1M737%
EBITDA148MN/A-
Gain YTD15.81245.92634%
P/E Ratio6.26N/A-
Revenue366MN/A-
Total Cash55.5MN/A-
Total Debt28.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QUCT: Fundamental Ratings
QUCT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HFAHFQUCT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HFAHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QUCT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLQIX16.58N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity I
RTSSX42.85N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Tax-Managed US Mid&Sm Cap S
GLVIX93.66N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Focus R6
EEMDX9.76N/A
N/A
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research R1
PIGFX38.66N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Fundamental Growth A

HFAHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFAHF has been loosely correlated with JFHHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HFAHF jumps, then JFHHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFAHF
1D Price
Change %
HFAHF100%
N/A
JFHHF - HFAHF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PNXPF - HFAHF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITPC - HFAHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUCT - HFAHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
ELRNF - HFAHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QUCT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QUCT and FNNCF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QUCT and FNNCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUCT
1D Price
Change %
QUCT100%
+1.81%
FNNCF - QUCT
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLSPF - QUCT
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNCSF - QUCT
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITPC - QUCT
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFAHF - QUCT
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More