HFBA
Price
$29.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
33.67M
HSNGF
Price
$15.35
Change
+$1.08 (+7.57%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
27.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HFBA vs HSNGF

Header iconHFBA vs HSNGF Comparison
Open Charts HFBA vs HSNGFBanner chart's image
HFB Financial
Price$29.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$182
Capitalization33.67M
Hang Seng Bank
Price$15.35
Change+$1.08 (+7.57%)
Volume$100
Capitalization27.6B
HFBA vs HSNGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HFBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HSNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HFBA vs. HSNGF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFBA is a Hold and HSNGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HFBA: $29.55 vs. HSNGF: $15.35)
Brand notoriety: HFBA and HSNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HFBA: 24% vs. HSNGF: 6%
Market capitalization -- HFBA: $33.67M vs. HSNGF: $27.6B
HFBA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $33.67M. HSNGF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $27.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HFBA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHSNGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HFBA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HSNGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HFBA is a better buy in the long-term than HSNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HFBA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HSNGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HFBA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HSNGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HSNGF is a better buy in the short-term than HFBA.

Price Growth

HFBA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.37% price change this week, while HSNGF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.65% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSNGF($27.6B) has a higher market cap than HFBA($33.7M). HSNGF has higher P/E ratio than HFBA: HSNGF (15.64) vs HFBA (13.25). HSNGF YTD gains are higher at: 26.026 vs. HFBA (1.252). HFBA has less debt than HSNGF: HFBA (28.9M) vs HSNGF (32.1B). HSNGF has higher revenues than HFBA: HSNGF (42.1B) vs HFBA (19.7M).
HFBAHSNGFHFBA / HSNGF
Capitalization33.7M27.6B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.25226.0265%
P/E Ratio13.2515.6485%
Revenue19.7M42.1B0%
Total Cash4.78MN/A-
Total Debt28.9M32.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HFBA vs HSNGF: Fundamental Ratings
HFBA
HSNGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8943
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59100
SMR RATING
1..100
783
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1013
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFBA's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HSNGF (88). This means that HFBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

HFBA's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HSNGF (100). This means that HFBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

HSNGF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HFBA (78). This means that HSNGF’s stock grew significantly faster than HFBA’s over the last 12 months.

HSNGF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as HFBA (49). This means that HSNGF’s stock grew similarly to HFBA’s over the last 12 months.

HFBA's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGF (13). This means that HFBA’s stock grew similarly to HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HFBAHSNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HFBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HSNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKHSY22.490.12
+0.54%
Sekisui House Ltd.
APMRF0.15N/A
N/A
Amper SA Madrid
CSDX0.25N/A
N/A
CS Diagnostics Corp.
MMVVF0.03N/A
N/A
MultiMetaVerse Holdings Limited
PHPRF1.24N/A
N/A
Primary Health Properties Plc.

HFBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFBA and BNCZF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFBA and BNCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFBA
1D Price
Change %
HFBA100%
N/A
BNCZF - HFBA
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HARL - HFBA
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
HSNGY - HFBA
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.31%
HBIA - HFBA
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.57%
HFBK - HFBA
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HSNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HSNGF and IBTN have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HSNGF and IBTN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSNGF
1D Price
Change %
HSNGF100%
N/A
IBTN - HSNGF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
HSNGY - HSNGF
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.31%
IBWC - HSNGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFN - HSNGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFBA - HSNGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More