Ad is loading...
HFDFX vs VIMSX
HFDFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDFX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps F
Price$17.41
Change+$0.08 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets912.03M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$67.08
Change+$0.54 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.23B
HFDFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDFX is a Hold and VIMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. HFDFX (912M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDFX: VIMSX (1.46) vs HFDFX (0.44). HFDFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDFX (8 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDFX (0.82) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDFX: VIMSX (3000) vs HFDFX (1000000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.66 vs. HFDFX (-6.18). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 68.74 vs. HFDFX (35.54).
| HFDFX | VIMSX | HFDFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.17 | 482% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.17 | 482% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.396 | -6.870 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 912M | 175B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.46 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.18 | 4.66 | -133% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.70 | 6.59 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.54 | 68.74 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.65 | - |