Ad is loading...
HFDFX vs VIMSX
HFDFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDFX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps F
Price$18.34
Change-$0.07 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets964.42M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$69.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets181.84B
HFDFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Mar 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDFX is a Hold and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 182B vs. HFDFX (964M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDFX: VIMSX (1.33) vs HFDFX (0.42). HFDFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDFX (8 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDFX (0.82) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDFX: VIMSX (3000) vs HFDFX (1000000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. HFDFX (-5.60). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 83.95 vs. HFDFX (46.12).
| HFDFX | VIMSX | HFDFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.17 | 482% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.17 | 482% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.250 | -3.275 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 964M | 182B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.33 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.60 | 4.39 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.84 | 15.73 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.12 | 83.95 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...