Ad is loading...
HFDFX vs VIMSX
HFDFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDFX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps F
Price$18.58
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets953.86M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$71.70
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.12B
HFDFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDFX vs. VIMSX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDFX is a Buy and VIMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. HFDFX (954M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDFX: VIMSX (1.48) vs HFDFX (0.45). HFDFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDFX (8 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDFX (0.81) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDFX: VIMSX (3000) vs HFDFX (1000000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.29 vs. HFDFX (-3.80). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 73.28 vs. HFDFX (38.70).
| HFDFX | VIMSX | HFDFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.375 | -0.456 | 960% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 954M | 175B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.48 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.80 | 7.29 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.24 | 27.41 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.70 | 73.28 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...