Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDFX vs VIMSX
HFDFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDFX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps F
Price$19.70
Change+$0.06 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets976.31M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.42
Change+$0.15 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.76B
HFDFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDFX is a Hold and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 197B vs. HFDFX (976M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDFX: VIMSX (1.37) vs HFDFX (0.42). HFDFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDFX (9 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDFX (0.81) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). VIMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDFX: VIMSX (3000) vs HFDFX (1000000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.95 vs. HFDFX (-1.75). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 62.46 vs. HFDFX (28.10).
| HFDFX | VIMSX | HFDFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.17 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.081 | 10.054 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 976M | 197B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.37 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | 13.95 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.46 | 37.04 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.10 | 62.46 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 142.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement