Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDRX vs VIMSX
HFDRX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDRX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R3
Price$18.16
Change-$0.06 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets966.01M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$74.29
Change-$0.08 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
HFDRX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDRX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDRX is a Buy and VIMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. HFDRX (966M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDRX: VIMSX (1.40) vs HFDRX (0.00). HFDRX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDRX (9 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). HFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HFDRX (0) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.82 vs. HFDRX (-2.04). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 59.71 vs. HFDRX (22.53).
| HFDRX | VIMSX | HFDRX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.17 | 894% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.17 | 894% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.982 | 3.251 | -92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 966M | 185B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.04 | 11.82 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.30 | 25.42 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.53 | 59.71 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 116.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement