Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDTX vs VIMAX
HFDTX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts HFDTX vs VIMAX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R5
Price$19.13
Change-$0.22 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets974.26M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$351.04
Change-$1.03 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.76B
HFDTX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDTX vs. VIMAX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDTX is a Buy and VIMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 197B vs. HFDTX (974M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than HFDTX: VIMAX (1.49) vs HFDTX (0.31). HFDTX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: HFDTX (9 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). HFDTX (0.92) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). HFDTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMAX (16.00). HFDTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: HFDTX (0) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.69 vs. HFDTX (0.91). VIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.09 vs. HFDTX (27.01).
| HFDTX | VIMAX | HFDTX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.05 | 1,840% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.05 | 1,840% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.206 | 7.777 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 974M | 197B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.49 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.91 | 16.69 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.30 | 31.89 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.01 | 62.09 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 126.60 | - |