Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFGO vs IWF
HFGO vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts HFGO vs IWF
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
Price$25.97
Change+$0.06 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.22M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$447.11
Change+$2.00 (+0.45%)
Volume$488
Net Assets116.57B
HFGO vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFGO vs. IWF commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFGO is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 117B vs. HFGO (162M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than HFGO: IWF (11.066) vs HFGO (9.635). HFGO was incepted earlier than IWF: HFGO (4 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than HFGO (0.59). HFGO has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| HFGO | IWF | HFGO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 9.635 | 11.066 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 162M | 117B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.19 | 311% |
| Turnover | 41.00 | 12.00 | 342% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HFGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 86% | 13 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 76% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HFGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFGO has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFGO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HFGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFGO | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| NVDA - HFGO | 83% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| AMZN - HFGO | 76% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| MSFT - HFGO | 76% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| KKR - HFGO | 76% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| ISRG - HFGO | 75% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||