Ad is loading...
HFMCX vs RRMGX
HFMCX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts HFMCX vs RRMGX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$82.93
Change+$0.74 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.52B
HFMCX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFMCX vs. RRMGX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFMCX is a Buy and RRMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. HFMCX (4.43B). HFMCX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . HFMCX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: HFMCX (27 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than HFMCX (1.12). HFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). HFMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: HFMCX (2000) vs RRMGX (2500). HFMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.06 vs. RRMGX (-11.74). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : 2.56 vs. HFMCX (-13.85).
| HFMCX | RRMGX | HFMCX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.29 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.29 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.677 | -6.517 | 102% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.43B | 26.5B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.06 | -11.74 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.53 | 1.77 | -369% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.85 | 2.56 | -541% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.19 | 6.23 | -180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers