Ad is loading...
HFMDX vs NAESX
HFMDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFMDX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 I
Price$19.46
Change+$1.60 (+8.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$101.55
Change+$8.70 (+9.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
HFMDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFMDX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFMDX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. HFMDX (1.21B). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFMDX: NAESX (1.39) vs HFMDX (0.18). HFMDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFMDX (22 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HFMDX (1.34) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HFMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). HFMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HFMDX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.70 vs. HFMDX (-22.30). HFMDX return over 5 years is better than : 104.08 vs. NAESX (56.35).
| HFMDX | NAESX | HFMDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.938 | -19.296 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 143B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.39 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.30 | -13.70 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.17 | -5.18 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.08 | 56.35 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.71 | 63.14 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...