Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs IFTSX
HFQRX vs IFTSX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs IFTSX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
Voya International High Div Low Vol S
Price$12.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets345.29M
HFQRX vs IFTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. IFTSX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Buy and IFTSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.62B vs. IFTSX (345M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than IFTSX: HFQRX (7.21) vs IFTSX (3.68). HFQRX was incepted earlier than IFTSX: HFQRX (10 years) vs IFTSX (20 years). IFTSX (1.00) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. IFTSX (71.00). IFTSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: IFTSX (0) vs HFQRX (1000000). IFTSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.73 vs. HFQRX (21.36). IFTSX (73.35) and HFQRX (72.05) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HFQRX | IFTSX | HFQRX / IFTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.00 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.00 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.538 | 29.536 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.62B | 345M | 1,920% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.21 | 3.68 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.36 | 22.73 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.23 | 72.60 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.05 | 73.35 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers