Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs MKVBX
HFQRX vs MKVBX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs MKVBX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.85
Change-$0.04 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.3B
MFS International Large Cap Value A
Price$15.78
Change-$0.14 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.03B
HFQRX vs MKVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. MKVBX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Buy and MKVBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKVBX has more cash in the bank: 7.03B vs. HFQRX (6.3B). HFQRX pays higher dividends than MKVBX: HFQRX (7.42) vs MKVBX (2.27). HFQRX was incepted earlier than MKVBX: HFQRX (10 years) vs MKVBX (5 years). MKVBX (1.05) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. MKVBX (17.00). MKVBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: MKVBX (1000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.66 vs. MKVBX (15.17). HFQRX (68.68) and MKVBX (66.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HFQRX | MKVBX | HFQRX / MKVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.98 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.05 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.190 | 22.367 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.3B | 7.03B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.42 | 2.27 | 327% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.66 | 15.17 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.40 | 54.73 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.68 | 66.41 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement