Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs QFVOX
HFQRX vs QFVOX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs QFVOX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.96
Change-$0.05 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Ord
Price$27.96
Change-$0.15 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
HFQRX vs QFVOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. QFVOX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Hold and QFVOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.7B vs. QFVOX (1.43B). HFQRX pays higher dividends than QFVOX: HFQRX (7.24) vs QFVOX (1.55). HFQRX was incepted earlier than QFVOX: HFQRX (10 years) vs QFVOX (28 years). QFVOX (1.51) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. QFVOX (18.00). QFVOX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: QFVOX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). QFVOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.10 vs. HFQRX (20.72). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 59.64 vs. QFVOX (45.64).
| HFQRX | QFVOX | HFQRX / QFVOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.41 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.51 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.066 | 24.878 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.7B | 1.43B | 469% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.24 | 1.55 | 467% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.72 | 22.10 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.56 | 50.13 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.64 | 45.64 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement