Ad is loading...
HFQRX vs SIDNX
HFQRX vs SIDNX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs SIDNX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.14
Change+$0.11 (+1.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.77B
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val I
Price$10.48
Change+$0.27 (+2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
HFQRX vs SIDNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. SIDNX commentary
Apr 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Buy and SIDNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 5.77B vs. SIDNX (2.01B). HFQRX pays higher dividends than SIDNX: HFQRX (7.88) vs SIDNX (2.72). HFQRX was incepted earlier than SIDNX: HFQRX (9 years) vs SIDNX (19 years). SIDNX (0.86) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. SIDNX (112.00). SIDNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: SIDNX (2000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. SIDNX (6.05). SIDNX return over 5 years is better than : 68.01 vs. HFQRX (64.55).
| HFQRX | SIDNX | HFQRX / SIDNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.86 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.86 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.101 | 5.347 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.77B | 2.01B | 288% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.88 | 2.72 | 290% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.12 | 6.05 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.34 | 16.75 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.55 | 68.01 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers