Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs SIDNX
HFQRX vs SIDNX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs SIDNX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.03
Change+$0.02 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val I
Price$13.40
Change+$0.06 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59B
HFQRX vs SIDNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. SIDNX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a StrongBuy and SIDNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.62B vs. SIDNX (2.59B). HFQRX pays higher dividends than SIDNX: HFQRX (7.29) vs SIDNX (2.36). HFQRX was incepted earlier than SIDNX: HFQRX (10 years) vs SIDNX (19 years). SIDNX (0.87) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. SIDNX (142.00). SIDNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: SIDNX (2000) vs HFQRX (1000000). SIDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.87 vs. HFQRX (19.28). SIDNX return over 5 years is better than : 87.76 vs. HFQRX (71.65).
| HFQRX | SIDNX | HFQRX / SIDNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.87 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.87 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.942 | 36.077 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.62B | 2.59B | 255% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.29 | 2.36 | 309% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.28 | 28.87 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.68 | 86.59 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.65 | 87.76 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement