Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs TBCUX
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs TBCUX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.96
Change-$0.05 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
Tweedy, Browne Intl Val II - Ccy UnH
Price$16.97
Change-$0.07 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.71M
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. TBCUX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Hold and TBCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.7B vs. TBCUX (181M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than TBCUX: HFQRX (7.24) vs TBCUX (1.87). HFQRX was incepted earlier than TBCUX: HFQRX (10 years) vs TBCUX (16 years). TBCUX (1.43) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TBCUX (13.00). TBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: TBCUX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.72 vs. TBCUX (2.35). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 59.64 vs. TBCUX (23.36).
| HFQRX | TBCUX | HFQRX / TBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.42 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.43 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.066 | 21.454 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.7B | 181M | 3,700% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.24 | 1.87 | 387% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.72 | 2.35 | 883% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.56 | 18.51 | 246% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.64 | 23.36 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers