Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs TBCUX
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs TBCUX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.06
Change+$0.02 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
Tweedy, Browne Intl Val II - Ccy UnH
Price$17.19
Change+$0.18 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.5M
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. TBCUX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Buy and TBCUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.44B vs. TBCUX (187M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than TBCUX: HFQRX (7.21) vs TBCUX (1.90). HFQRX was incepted earlier than TBCUX: HFQRX (10 years) vs TBCUX (16 years). TBCUX (1.43) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TBCUX (13.00). TBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: TBCUX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.23 vs. TBCUX (-3.18). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 71.87 vs. TBCUX (36.06).
| HFQRX | TBCUX | HFQRX / TBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.42 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.43 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.813 | 22.523 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 187M | 3,446% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.21 | 1.90 | 380% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.23 | -3.18 | -635% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.84 | 28.15 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.87 | 36.06 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers