Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs TBCUX
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs TBCUX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
Tweedy, Browne Intl Val II - Ccy UnH
Price$16.85
Change-$0.08 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.32M
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. TBCUX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Buy and TBCUX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.44B vs. TBCUX (185M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than TBCUX: HFQRX (7.40) vs TBCUX (1.94). HFQRX was incepted earlier than TBCUX: HFQRX (10 years) vs TBCUX (16 years). TBCUX (1.40) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TBCUX (13.00). TBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: TBCUX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.70 vs. TBCUX (-2.61). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 68.50 vs. TBCUX (32.93).
| HFQRX | TBCUX | HFQRX / TBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.40 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.158 | 20.670 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 185M | 3,483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.40 | 1.94 | 381% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.70 | -2.61 | -870% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.42 | 18.37 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.50 | 32.93 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement