Ad is loading...
HFQRX vs TBCUX
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs TBCUX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.77B
Tweedy, Browne Intl Val II - Ccy UnH
Price$15.49
Change-$0.09 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.42M
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. TBCUX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Buy and TBCUX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 5.77B vs. TBCUX (176M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than TBCUX: HFQRX (7.88) vs TBCUX (2.08). HFQRX was incepted earlier than TBCUX: HFQRX (9 years) vs TBCUX (16 years). TBCUX (1.40) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TBCUX (13.00). TBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: TBCUX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.28 vs. TBCUX (-8.52). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 75.50 vs. TBCUX (37.13).
| HFQRX | TBCUX | HFQRX / TBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.40 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.978 | 10.406 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.77B | 176M | 3,279% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.88 | 2.08 | 378% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.28 | -8.52 | -168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.75 | 5.65 | 473% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.50 | 37.13 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...