Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs TBCUX
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs TBCUX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.90
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
Tweedy, Browne Intl Val II - Ccy UnH
Price$17.22
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.81M
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. TBCUX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Buy and TBCUX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.24B vs. TBCUX (191M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than TBCUX: HFQRX (7.42) vs TBCUX (1.89). HFQRX was incepted earlier than TBCUX: HFQRX (10 years) vs TBCUX (16 years). TBCUX (1.40) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TBCUX (13.00). TBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: TBCUX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.01 vs. TBCUX (-1.16). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 72.48 vs. TBCUX (41.18).
| HFQRX | TBCUX | HFQRX / TBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.40 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.052 | 22.737 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 191M | 3,265% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.42 | 1.89 | 393% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.01 | -1.16 | -1,636% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.73 | 23.00 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.48 | 41.18 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers