Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs TBCUX
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs TBCUX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.96
Change+$0.04 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.59B
Tweedy, Browne Intl Val II - Ccy UnH
Price$16.97
Change-$0.06 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.58M
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. TBCUX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Hold and TBCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.59B vs. TBCUX (184M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than TBCUX: HFQRX (7.29) vs TBCUX (1.87). HFQRX was incepted earlier than TBCUX: HFQRX (10 years) vs TBCUX (16 years). TBCUX (1.43) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TBCUX (13.00). TBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: TBCUX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.32 vs. TBCUX (-2.64). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 72.70 vs. TBCUX (36.40).
| HFQRX | TBCUX | HFQRX / TBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.42 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.43 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.066 | 21.383 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.59B | 184M | 3,584% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.29 | 1.87 | 391% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.32 | -2.64 | -657% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.73 | 34.24 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.70 | 36.40 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers