Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs TBCUX
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs TBCUX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.96B
Tweedy, Browne Intl Val II - Ccy UnH
Price$16.31
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets182.96M
HFQRX vs TBCUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. TBCUX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Buy and TBCUX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. TBCUX (183M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than TBCUX: HFQRX (7.74) vs TBCUX (2.02). HFQRX was incepted earlier than TBCUX: HFQRX (9 years) vs TBCUX (16 years). TBCUX (1.40) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TBCUX (13.00). TBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: TBCUX (2500) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.66 vs. TBCUX (-7.91). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 79.82 vs. TBCUX (44.27).
| HFQRX | TBCUX | HFQRX / TBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.40 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.680 | 16.536 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 183M | 3,257% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.74 | 2.02 | 382% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.66 | -7.91 | -173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.85 | 11.66 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.82 | 44.27 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers