Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFSSX vs TRIGX
HFSSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFSSX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val SDR
Price$15.13
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.04M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.91
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.01B
HFSSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. HFSSX (106M). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFSSX: TRIGX (2.11) vs HFSSX (1.54). HFSSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFSSX (3 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). HFSSX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFSSX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFSSX (5000000). HFSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.63 vs. TRIGX (20.00).
| HFSSX | TRIGX | HFSSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.87 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.764 | 22.837 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106M | 15B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 2.11 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.63 | 20.00 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.51 | 51.83 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 86.11 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement