Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYCX vs TRIGX
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYCX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C
Price$12.01
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.91
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.01B
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. HFYCX (2.31B). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFYCX: TRIGX (2.11) vs HFYCX (1.59). HFYCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYCX (9 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). HFYCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYCX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.00 vs. HFYCX (17.68). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 86.11 vs. HFYCX (61.14).
| HFYCX | TRIGX | HFYCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.610 | 22.837 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 15B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 2.11 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.68 | 20.00 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.77 | 51.83 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.14 | 86.11 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement