Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYCX vs TRIGX
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYCX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C
Price$13.42
Change-$0.13 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.68B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.99
Change-$0.19 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.44B
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYCX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. HFYCX (2.68B). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFYCX: TRIGX (1.90) vs HFYCX (1.45). HFYCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYCX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYCX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). HFYCX (35.69) and TRIGX (34.00) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 87.56 vs. HFYCX (71.82).
| HFYCX | TRIGX | HFYCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.726 | 35.315 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.68B | 16.4B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.90 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.69 | 34.00 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.13 | 78.01 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.82 | 87.56 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement