Ad is loading...
HFYCX vs TRIGX
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYCX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C
Price$11.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.13
Change-$0.09 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.48B
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYCX vs. TRIGX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. HFYCX (2.22B). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFYCX: TRIGX (2.21) vs HFYCX (1.68). HFYCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYCX (9 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). HFYCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYCX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.48 vs. HFYCX (13.08). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 113.55 vs. HFYCX (77.25).
| HFYCX | TRIGX | HFYCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.677 | 18.776 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 14.5B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 2.21 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.08 | 17.48 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.10 | 55.92 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.25 | 113.55 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers