Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYCX vs TRIGX
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYCX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C
Price$13.28
Change-$0.11 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.61B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.92
Change-$0.21 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.55B
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYCX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.5B vs. HFYCX (2.61B). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFYCX: TRIGX (1.91) vs HFYCX (1.47). HFYCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYCX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYCX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX (28.11) and HFYCX (27.44) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 106.76 vs. HFYCX (81.49).
| HFYCX | TRIGX | HFYCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.099 | 36.139 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.61B | 16.5B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.91 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.44 | 28.11 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.62 | 106.36 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.49 | 106.76 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers