Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYCX vs TRIGX
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYCX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C
Price$12.92
Change+$0.05 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.43
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.42B
HFYCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. HFYCX (2.52B). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFYCX: TRIGX (2.05) vs HFYCX (1.71). HFYCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYCX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYCX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). HFYCX (24.55) and TRIGX (23.91) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 96.87 vs. HFYCX (71.62).
| HFYCX | TRIGX | HFYCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.709 | 31.607 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 16.4B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 2.05 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.55 | 23.91 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.13 | 83.62 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.62 | 96.87 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement