Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYRX vs TRIGX
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYRX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R3
Price$12.19
Change-$0.03 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.35B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.05
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.16B
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYRX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYRX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. HFYRX (2.35B). TRIGX (2.11) and HFYRX (2.03) have matching dividends . HFYRX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYRX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYRX (1.47) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYRX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.54 vs. HFYRX (21.81). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 100.39 vs. HFYRX (76.39).
| HFYRX | TRIGX | HFYRX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.933 | 24.191 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.35B | 15.2B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 2.11 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.81 | 24.54 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.67 | 65.62 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.39 | 100.39 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers