Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYRX vs TRIGX
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYRX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R3
Price$12.90
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.32
Change+$0.11 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.16B
HFYRX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYRX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYRX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. HFYRX (2.5B). HFYRX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYRX (2.06) vs TRIGX (1.96). HFYRX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYRX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYRX (1.47) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYRX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). HFYRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.97 vs. TRIGX (24.70). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.34 vs. HFYRX (77.77).
| HFYRX | TRIGX | HFYRX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.87 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.478 | 30.724 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 16.2B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 1.96 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.97 | 24.70 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.08 | 87.21 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.77 | 99.34 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers