Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYTX vs TRIGX
HFYTX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYTX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R5
Price$12.06
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.91
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.02B
HFYTX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYTX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYTX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. HFYTX (2.31B). HFYTX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYTX (2.49) vs TRIGX (2.11). HFYTX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYTX (9 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). TRIGX (0.87) and HFYTX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HFYTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYTX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.00 vs. HFYTX (18.81). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 86.11 vs. HFYTX (68.09).
| HFYTX | TRIGX | HFYTX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.047 | 22.837 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 15B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 2.11 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.81 | 20.00 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.64 | 51.83 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.09 | 86.11 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers