Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYTX vs TRIGX
HFYTX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYTX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R5
Price$13.32
Change-$0.11 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.61B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.92
Change-$0.21 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.55B
HFYTX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYTX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYTX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.5B vs. HFYTX (2.61B). HFYTX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYTX (2.38) vs TRIGX (1.91). HFYTX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYTX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) and HFYTX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HFYTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYTX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). HFYTX (28.68) and TRIGX (28.11) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 106.76 vs. HFYTX (90.24).
| HFYTX | TRIGX | HFYTX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.152 | 36.139 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.61B | 16.5B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 1.91 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.68 | 28.11 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.17 | 106.36 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.24 | 106.76 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers