Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYTX vs TRIGX
HFYTX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYTX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R5
Price$13.48
Change-$0.13 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.68B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.99
Change-$0.19 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.44B
HFYTX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYTX vs. TRIGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYTX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. HFYTX (2.68B). HFYTX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYTX (2.35) vs TRIGX (1.90). HFYTX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYTX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) and HFYTX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HFYTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYTX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). HFYTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.04 vs. TRIGX (34.00). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 87.56 vs. HFYTX (80.42).
| HFYTX | TRIGX | HFYTX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.990 | 35.315 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.68B | 16.4B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 1.90 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.04 | 34.00 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.30 | 78.01 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.42 | 87.56 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers