HGHAF
Price
$0.63
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.73M
MCCRF
Price
$2.73
Change
+$0.03 (+1.11%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
71.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HGHAF vs MCCRF

Header iconHGHAF vs MCCRF Comparison
Open Charts HGHAF vs MCCRFBanner chart's image
HIGH ARCTIC ENERGY SVCS INC NEW
Price$0.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization7.73M
McCoy Global
Price$2.73
Change+$0.03 (+1.11%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization71.86M
HGHAF vs MCCRF Comparison Chart in %
HGHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HGHAF vs. MCCRF commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHAF is a StrongBuy and MCCRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HGHAF: $0.63 vs. MCCRF: $2.73)
Brand notoriety: HGHAF and MCCRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HGHAF: 40% vs. MCCRF: 17%
Market capitalization -- HGHAF: $7.73M vs. MCCRF: $71.86M
HGHAF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $7.73M. MCCRF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $71.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $51.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HGHAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCCRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HGHAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCCRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCCRF is a better buy in the long-term than HGHAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HGHAF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCCRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HGHAF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MCCRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HGHAF is a better buy in the short-term than MCCRF.

Price Growth

HGHAF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCCRF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.35% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCCRF($71.9M) has a higher market cap than HGHAF($7.73M). MCCRF YTD gains are higher at: 37.879 vs. HGHAF (-19.103). MCCRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13M vs. HGHAF (1.65M). MCCRF has more cash in the bank: 6.61M vs. HGHAF (2.43M). MCCRF has less debt than HGHAF: MCCRF (3.67M) vs HGHAF (4.52M). MCCRF has higher revenues than HGHAF: MCCRF (84.5M) vs HGHAF (9.68M).
HGHAFMCCRFHGHAF / MCCRF
Capitalization7.73M71.9M11%
EBITDA1.65M13M13%
Gain YTD-19.10337.879-50%
P/E RatioN/A15.25-
Revenue9.68M84.5M11%
Total Cash2.43M6.61M37%
Total Debt4.52M3.67M123%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HGHAF vs MCCRF: Fundamental Ratings
HGHAF
MCCRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9229
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
1765
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
121
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCCRF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGHAF (98). This means that MCCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGHAF’s over the last 12 months.

MCCRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HGHAF (100). This means that MCCRF’s stock grew significantly faster than HGHAF’s over the last 12 months.

HGHAF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCCRF (65). This means that HGHAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCCRF’s over the last 12 months.

MCCRF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as HGHAF (61). This means that MCCRF’s stock grew similarly to HGHAF’s over the last 12 months.

HGHAF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MCCRF (21). This means that HGHAF’s stock grew similarly to MCCRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HGHAFMCCRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HGHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSCI564.814.69
+0.84%
MSCI
GLBS1.07N/A
-0.08%
Globus Maritime Limited
FG31.04-0.09
-0.29%
F&G Annuities & Life
BCSF13.97-0.08
-0.57%
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
KINS14.30-0.75
-4.98%
Kingstone Companies

HGHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGHAF and SBFFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGHAF and SBFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGHAF
1D Price
Change %
HGHAF100%
N/A
SBFFF - HGHAF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDER - HGHAF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
NSFDF - HGHAF
6%
Poorly correlated
-6.24%
MCCRF - HGHAF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
ETOLF - HGHAF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
More

MCCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCCRF and PLSDF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCCRF and PLSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCCRF
1D Price
Change %
MCCRF100%
+1.11%
PLSDF - MCCRF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.77%
NSFDF - MCCRF
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.24%
KEGX - MCCRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGHAF - MCCRF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QSEP - MCCRF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
More