Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGHAX vs SHSAX
HGHAX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGHAX vs. SHSAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHAX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.58B vs. HGHAX (834M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than HGHAX: SHSAX (0.21) vs HGHAX (0.18). HGHAX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: HGHAX (26 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). HGHAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). SHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. HGHAX (40.00). HGHAX (6%) and SHSAX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: SHSAX (1000) vs HGHAX (2000). HGHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.34 vs. SHSAX (-0.09). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -7.39 vs. HGHAX (-11.07).
| HGHAX | SHSAX | HGHAX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.09 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.09 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.069 | 7.047 | 171% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 834M | 6.58B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.21 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.34 | -0.09 | -4,621% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.52 | 3.89 | 296% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.07 | -7.39 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.99 | 27.96 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement