Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGHAX vs SHSAX
HGHAX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGHAX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHAX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.31B vs. HGHAX (771M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than HGHAX: SHSAX (0.22) vs HGHAX (0.20). HGHAX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: HGHAX (25 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). HGHAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). HGHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). HGHAX (6%) and SHSAX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: SHSAX (1000) vs HGHAX (2000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.26 vs. HGHAX (-17.13). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -15.72 vs. HGHAX (-18.39).
| HGHAX | SHSAX | HGHAX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.09 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.09 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.483 | -6.182 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 771M | 6.31B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.22 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.13 | -16.26 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.95 | -6.90 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.39 | -15.72 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.11 | 1.74 | -1,215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement