Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGHAX vs SHSAX
HGHAX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGHAX vs. SHSAX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHAX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.07B vs. HGHAX (751M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than HGHAX: SHSAX (0.23) vs HGHAX (0.20). HGHAX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: HGHAX (25 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). HGHAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). SHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. HGHAX (40.00). HGHAX (6%) and SHSAX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: SHSAX (1000) vs HGHAX (2000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.37 vs. HGHAX (-18.05). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -13.76 vs. HGHAX (-16.87).
| HGHAX | SHSAX | HGHAX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.09 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.09 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.557 | -4.596 | 56% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 751M | 6.07B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.23 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.05 | -16.37 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.64 | 2.70 | 246% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.87 | -13.76 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.45 | 23.96 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement