Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGHAX vs SHSAX
HGHAX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGHAX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHAX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.5B vs. HGHAX (807M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than HGHAX: SHSAX (0.23) vs HGHAX (0.20). HGHAX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: HGHAX (25 years) vs SHSAX (25 years). HGHAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). HGHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). HGHAX (6%) and SHSAX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: SHSAX (1000) vs HGHAX (2000). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.06 vs. HGHAX (-16.09). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -8.40 vs. HGHAX (-16.26).
| HGHAX | SHSAX | HGHAX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.09 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.09 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.086 | -1.986 | 256% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 807M | 6.5B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.23 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.09 | -14.06 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.99 | -8.61 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.26 | -8.40 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.94 | 12.20 | -147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers