HGMCF
Price
$15.05
Change
+$0.70 (+4.88%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.16B
HVGDF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
574.57K
Interact to see
Advertisement

HGMCF vs HVGDF

Header iconHGMCF vs HVGDF Comparison
Open Charts HGMCF vs HVGDFBanner chart's image
Harmony Gold Mining
Price$15.05
Change+$0.70 (+4.88%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.16B
Harvest Gold
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization574.57K
HGMCF vs HVGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HGMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HGMCF vs. HVGDF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGMCF is a Buy and HVGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HGMCF: $15.05 vs. HVGDF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: HGMCF and HVGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HGMCF: 65% vs. HVGDF: 2%
Market capitalization -- HGMCF: $5.16B vs. HVGDF: $574.57K
HGMCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.16B. HVGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $574.57K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HGMCF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHVGDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HGMCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HVGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HGMCF is a better buy in the long-term than HVGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HGMCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HVGDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HGMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HVGDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HVGDF is a better buy in the short-term than HGMCF.

Price Growth

HGMCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.90% price change this week, while HVGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +34.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.16% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HGMCF($5.16B) has a higher market cap than HVGDF($575K). HVGDF has higher P/E ratio than HGMCF: HVGDF (12.69) vs HGMCF (10.56). HVGDF YTD gains are higher at: 270.000 vs. HGMCF (81.983). HGMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.8B vs. HVGDF (-322.51K). HGMCF has more cash in the bank: 3.44B vs. HVGDF (449K). HGMCF has higher revenues than HVGDF: HGMCF (57.4B) vs HVGDF (0).
HGMCFHVGDFHGMCF / HVGDF
Capitalization5.16B575K897,739%
EBITDA12.8B-322.51K-3,968,894%
Gain YTD81.983270.00030%
P/E Ratio10.5612.6983%
Revenue57.4B0-
Total Cash3.44B449K765,256%
Total Debt3.36BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HGMCF vs HVGDF: Fundamental Ratings
HGMCF
HVGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3168
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
3593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HGMCF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVGDF (54). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HVGDF (100). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVGDF (93). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HGMCF (46). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to HGMCF’s over the last 12 months.

HGMCF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HVGDF (100). This means that HGMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HGMCFHVGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HGMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLNAX13.210.04
+0.30%
Meeder Balanced Adviser
VYCGX26.720.05
+0.19%
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 R6
RNPCX68.750.05
+0.07%
American Funds New Perspective R3
ABIAX17.85-0.01
-0.06%
AB International Value A
TGVRX31.03-0.18
-0.58%
Thornburg International Equity R3

HGMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGMCF and BLTMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGMCF and BLTMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGMCF
1D Price
Change %
HGMCF100%
N/A
BLTMF - HGMCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMY - HGMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
NSRPF - HGMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
PPTA - HGMCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.77%
MNSAF - HGMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
More

HVGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HVGDF has been loosely correlated with SDRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HVGDF jumps, then SDRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVGDF
1D Price
Change %
HVGDF100%
+13.85%
SDRC - HVGDF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
CRCUF - HVGDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
PDIV - HVGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+27.20%
MEXGF - HVGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGMCF - HVGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More