Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGOCX vs RGEBX
HGOCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGOCX vs RGEBX
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$66.17
Change-$0.38 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.86B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.70
Change-$0.55 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
HGOCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGOCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGOCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. HGOCX (6.86B). HGOCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . HGOCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: HGOCX (24 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: RGEBX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.29 vs. RGEBX (14.27). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.33 vs. HGOCX (-40.81).
| HGOCX | RGEBX | HGOCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.09 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.09 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.682 | 18.561 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.86B | 343B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.29 | 14.27 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 123.32 | 72.01 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.81 | 39.33 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.05 | 95.24 | -44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement