Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXAX vs RSEBX
HGXAX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact A
Price$16.38
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets280.55M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$67.05
Change-$0.21 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.42B
HGXAX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jun 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 75.4B vs. HGXAX (281M). HGXAX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXAX (0.63) vs RSEBX (0.21). HGXAX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXAX (8 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXAX (1.21). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). HGXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.11 vs. RSEBX (4.84). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.99 vs. RSEBX (15.08).
| HGXAX | RSEBX | HGXAX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.45 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.45 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.019 | 3.143 | 192% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 75.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.21 | 300% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | 4.84 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.93 | 28.28 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.99 | 15.08 | 338% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers