Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXAX vs RSEBX
HGXAX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact A
Price$17.43
Change-$0.11 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets330.06M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$72.14
Change-$0.77 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.2B
HGXAX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. RSEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 82.2B vs. HGXAX (330M). HGXAX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXAX (0.60) vs RSEBX (0.23). HGXAX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXAX (9 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXAX (1.21). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). HGXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. RSEBX (8.18). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.66 vs. RSEBX (7.30).
| HGXAX | RSEBX | HGXAX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.45 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.45 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.528 | 10.973 | 123% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330M | 82.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.23 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.97 | 8.18 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.23 | 41.24 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 7.30 | 448% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement