Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXAX vs RSEBX
HGXAX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact A
Price$16.91
Change-$0.08 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.36M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$70.01
Change-$0.31 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
HGXAX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. RSEBX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a StrongBuy and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. HGXAX (304M). HGXAX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXAX (0.62) vs RSEBX (0.23). HGXAX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXAX (8 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXAX (1.21). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). HGXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.86 vs. RSEBX (11.58). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.47 vs. RSEBX (11.15).
| HGXAX | RSEBX | HGXAX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.45 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.45 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.968 | 7.697 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304M | 79.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.23 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | 11.58 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.36 | 17.96 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.47 | 11.15 | 336% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement