Ad is loading...
HGXAX vs RSEBX
HGXAX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact A
Price$14.71
Change+$0.32 (+2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.41M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$58.25
Change+$1.00 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.58B
HGXAX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. RSEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 64.6B vs. HGXAX (238M). HGXAX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXAX (0.68) vs RSEBX (0.23). HGXAX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXAX (8 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXAX (1.24). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). HGXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.52 vs. RSEBX (-9.95). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.34 vs. RSEBX (23.79).
| HGXAX | RSEBX | HGXAX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.45 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.45 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.861 | -10.426 | 66% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 64.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.23 | 297% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.52 | -9.95 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.26 | -7.07 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.34 | 23.79 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...