Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXAX vs RSEBX
HGXAX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact A
Price$16.68
Change+$0.07 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.16M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$69.58
Change+$0.41 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.69B
HGXAX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 77.7B vs. HGXAX (291M). HGXAX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXAX (0.61) vs RSEBX (0.23). HGXAX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXAX (8 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXAX (1.21). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). HGXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.29 vs. RSEBX (2.82). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.73 vs. RSEBX (14.68).
| HGXAX | RSEBX | HGXAX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.45 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.45 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.508 | 7.035 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 291M | 77.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.23 | 263% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 2.82 | 294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.84 | 31.94 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.73 | 14.68 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.85 | - |