Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXAX vs RSLCX
HGXAX vs RSLCX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs RSLCX
Hartford Global Impact A
Price$17.43
Change-$0.11 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets330.06M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R3
Price$69.79
Change-$0.75 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.2B
HGXAX vs RSLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. RSLCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Buy and RSLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLCX has more cash in the bank: 82.2B vs. HGXAX (330M). HGXAX pays higher dividends than RSLCX: HGXAX (0.60) vs RSLCX (0.39). HGXAX was incepted earlier than RSLCX: HGXAX (9 years) vs RSLCX (23 years). RSLCX (1.30) is less costly to investors than HGXAX (1.21). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLCX (32.00). RSLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: RSLCX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). HGXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. RSLCX (8.33). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.66 vs. RSLCX (7.69).
| HGXAX | RSLCX | HGXAX / RSLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.30 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.30 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.528 | 11.082 | 122% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330M | 82.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.39 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.97 | 8.33 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.23 | 41.89 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 7.69 | 424% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement