Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXCX vs RSEBX
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$15.92
Change-$0.16 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets281.36M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$67.10
Change-$1.07 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.47B
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. HGXCX (281M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSEBX (0.21) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXCX (8 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.02 vs. RSEBX (4.32). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.76 vs. RSEBX (19.06).
| HGXCX | RSEBX | HGXCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.45 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.45 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.488 | 3.183 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.02 | 4.32 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.80 | 28.42 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.76 | 19.06 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement