Ad is loading...
HGXCX vs RSEBX
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$14.36
Change+$0.12 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.43M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$59.09
Change+$0.55 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.08B
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 66.1B vs. HGXCX (244M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSEBX (0.23) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXCX (8 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). HGXCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.11 vs. RSEBX (-4.40). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.27 vs. RSEBX (21.27).
| HGXCX | RSEBX | HGXCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.45 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.45 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.749 | -9.134 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 244M | 66.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | -4.40 | -139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.56 | -5.51 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.27 | 21.27 | 232% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...