Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXCX vs RSEBX
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.43
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.17M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.04
Change+$0.35 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.4B
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 79.4B vs. HGXCX (299M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSEBX (0.23) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXCX (8 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.54 vs. RSEBX (9.34). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.58 vs. RSEBX (16.78).
| HGXCX | RSEBX | HGXCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.45 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.45 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.365 | 9.281 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 79.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.54 | 9.34 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.49 | 31.03 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.58 | 16.78 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers