Ad is loading...
HGXCX vs RSEBX
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$14.91
Change-$0.45 (-2.93%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$65.55
Change-$2.06 (-3.05%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 76.3B vs. HGXCX (256M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSEBX (0.31) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXCX (8 years) vs RSEBX (10 years). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RSEBX (29.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.11 vs. RSEBX (8.16). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.56 vs. RSEBX (13.75).
| HGXCX | RSEBX | HGXCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.663 | 5.707 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 76.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.11 | 8.16 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.60 | -9.26 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.56 | 13.75 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.95 | - |