Ad is loading...
HGXCX vs RSEBX
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$15.48
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets258.59M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$65.85
Change+$0.28 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.12B
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a StrongBuy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 75.1B vs. HGXCX (259M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSEBX (0.31) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXCX (8 years) vs RSEBX (10 years). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RSEBX (29.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.96 vs. RSEBX (7.35). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.41 vs. RSEBX (11.32).
| HGXCX | RSEBX | HGXCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.545 | 1.261 | 281% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 259M | 75.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.96 | 7.35 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.45 | -5.83 | -42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.41 | 11.32 | 269% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...