Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
HGXCX vs RSEBX
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$15.03
Change-$0.14 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$66.10
Change-$0.81 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
HGXCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a StrongBuy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. HGXCX (240M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSEBX (0.31) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXCX (8 years) vs RSEBX (10 years). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RSEBX (29.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.10 vs. RSEBX (15.47). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.33 vs. RSEBX (15.94).
| HGXCX | RSEBX | HGXCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.285 | 3.346 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 240M | 74.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.10 | 15.47 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.57 | -27.00 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.33 | 15.94 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.37 | - |