Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXCX vs RSLDX
HGXCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSLDX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.43
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.17M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$74.66
Change+$0.37 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.4B
HGXCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSLDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Buy and RSLDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 79.4B vs. HGXCX (299M). RSLDX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSLDX (0.81) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: HGXCX (8 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSLDX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.54 vs. RSLDX (10.07). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.58 vs. RSLDX (20.95).
| HGXCX | RSLDX | HGXCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.80 | 243% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.80 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.365 | 9.684 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 79.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.81 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.54 | 10.07 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.49 | 33.39 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.58 | 20.95 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers