Ad is loading...
HGXCX vs RSLDX
HGXCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSLDX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$15.48
Change+$0.17 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.89M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$66.93
Change+$0.21 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.85B
HGXCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSLDX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Buy and RSLDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. HGXCX (268M). RSLDX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSLDX (0.88) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: HGXCX (8 years) vs RSLDX (9 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSLDX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. RSLDX (-0.16). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.93 vs. RSLDX (25.54).
| HGXCX | RSLDX | HGXCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.80 | 243% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.80 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.545 | -1.704 | -208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 71.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.88 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.80 | -0.16 | -4,736% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.45 | 19.12 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.93 | 25.54 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers