Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXCX vs RSLDX
HGXCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs RSLDX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.75
Change+$0.14 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.13M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$76.15
Change+$0.55 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.82B
HGXCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. RSLDX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Buy and RSLDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. HGXCX (321M). RSLDX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: RSLDX (0.79) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: HGXCX (9 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: RSLDX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). RSLDX (11.78) and HGXCX (11.22) have marching annual gain over last year. HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.73 vs. RSLDX (18.31).
| HGXCX | RSLDX | HGXCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.80 | 243% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.80 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.040 | 11.065 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 321M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.22 | 11.78 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.73 | 36.56 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.73 | 18.31 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement