Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXFX vs RSEBX
HGXFX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXFX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact F
Price$16.94
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.66M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$70.32
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.39B
HGXFX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXFX vs. RSEBX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXFX is a StrongBuy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 79.4B vs. HGXFX (305M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXFX (1.09) vs RSEBX (0.23). HGXFX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXFX (8 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXFX (0.75). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). HGXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.08 vs. RSEBX (12.11). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.69 vs. RSEBX (11.20).
| HGXFX | RSEBX | HGXFX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.45 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.45 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.489 | 8.173 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 79.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.23 | 466% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.08 | 12.11 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.93 | 23.43 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.69 | 11.20 | 363% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers