Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXFX vs RSEBX
HGXFX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXFX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact F
Price$17.41
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets312.69M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$72.21
Change+$0.19 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.76B
HGXFX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXFX vs. RSEBX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXFX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. HGXFX (313M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXFX (1.09) vs RSEBX (0.23). HGXFX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXFX (9 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXFX (0.75). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). HGXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.35 vs. RSEBX (9.22). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.33 vs. RSEBX (11.22).
| HGXFX | RSEBX | HGXFX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.45 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.45 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.290 | 11.081 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 313M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.23 | 466% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.35 | 9.22 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.81 | 30.15 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.33 | 11.22 | 368% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement