Ad is loading...
HGXFX vs RSEBX
HGXFX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXFX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact F
Price$15.44
Change+$0.12 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.95M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$61.67
Change+$0.79 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.86B
HGXFX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXFX vs. RSEBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXFX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 68.9B vs. HGXFX (255M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXFX (1.20) vs RSEBX (0.23). HGXFX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXFX (8 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXFX (0.77). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). HGXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.75 vs. RSEBX (-4.98). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 85.09 vs. RSEBX (47.10).
| HGXFX | RSEBX | HGXFX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.45 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.45 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.195 | -5.167 | 4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 255M | 68.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.23 | 526% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.75 | -4.98 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.37 | -6.23 | -54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.09 | 47.10 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...