Ad is loading...
HGXIX vs RSEBX
HGXIX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$15.46
Change+$0.12 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.95M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$61.67
Change+$0.79 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.86B
HGXIX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSEBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 68.9B vs. HGXIX (255M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXIX (0.99) vs RSEBX (0.23). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXIX (8 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.88). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.52 vs. RSEBX (-4.98). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 83.63 vs. RSEBX (47.10).
| HGXIX | RSEBX | HGXIX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.45 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.45 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.260 | -5.167 | 5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 255M | 68.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.23 | 434% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.52 | -4.98 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.75 | -6.23 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.63 | 47.10 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...