Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSEBX
HGXIX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$16.64
Change+$0.07 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.16M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$69.58
Change+$0.41 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.69B
HGXIX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 77.7B vs. HGXIX (291M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXIX (0.89) vs RSEBX (0.23). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXIX (8 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSEBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.57 vs. RSEBX (2.82). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 46.51 vs. RSEBX (14.68).
| HGXIX | RSEBX | HGXIX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.45 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.45 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.737 | 7.035 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 291M | 77.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.23 | 383% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.57 | 2.82 | 304% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.08 | 31.94 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.51 | 14.68 | 317% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.85 | - |