Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSLBX
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$17.46
Change-$0.15 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.35M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.51
Change-$0.49 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.39B
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLBX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Hold and RSLBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. HGXIX (322M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: HGXIX (0.87) vs RSLBX (0.06). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: HGXIX (9 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. RSLBX (10.71). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 43.44 vs. RSLBX (13.47).
| HGXIX | RSLBX | HGXIX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.524 | 11.428 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322M | 81.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.06 | 1,540% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.64 | 10.71 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.57 | 31.72 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.44 | 13.47 | 323% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers