Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSLBX
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$16.64
Change+$0.07 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.16M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$60.91
Change+$0.36 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.69B
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLBX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 77.7B vs. HGXIX (291M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: HGXIX (0.89) vs RSLBX (0.06). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: HGXIX (8 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.57 vs. RSLBX (2.52). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 46.51 vs. RSLBX (11.45).
| HGXIX | RSLBX | HGXIX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.737 | 6.866 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 291M | 77.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.06 | 1,539% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.57 | 2.52 | 340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.08 | 30.79 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.51 | 11.45 | 406% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers