Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSLBX
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$17.29
Change-$0.15 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets315.34M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.81
Change-$0.45 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.34B
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLBX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 81.3B vs. HGXIX (315M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: HGXIX (0.90) vs RSLBX (0.06). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: HGXIX (8 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. RSLBX (6.92). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 41.03 vs. RSLBX (7.89).
| HGXIX | RSLBX | HGXIX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.394 | 10.200 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315M | 81.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.06 | 1,546% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 6.92 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.41 | 27.39 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.03 | 7.89 | 520% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement