Ad is loading...
HGXIX vs RSLBX
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$15.00
Change-$0.46 (-2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.04M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$51.57
Change-$2.46 (-4.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.74B
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 69.7B vs. HGXIX (257M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: HGXIX (0.99) vs RSLBX (0.02). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: HGXIX (8 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.88). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.52 vs. RSLBX (-5.77). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 83.63 vs. RSLBX (42.96).
| HGXIX | RSLBX | HGXIX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.260 | -5.244 | 5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 257M | 69.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.02 | 4,866% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.52 | -5.77 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.75 | -8.08 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.63 | 42.96 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...