Ad is loading...
HGXIX vs RSLBX
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$15.35
Change+$0.28 (+1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.13M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$53.69
Change+$0.94 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.94B
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLBX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 67.9B vs. HGXIX (251M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: HGXIX (0.99) vs RSLBX (0.02). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: HGXIX (8 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.88). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. RSLBX (-2.54). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 63.69 vs. RSLBX (21.65).
| HGXIX | RSLBX | HGXIX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.016 | -5.840 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 67.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.02 | 4,866% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.38 | -2.54 | -290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.13 | -0.64 | -1,266% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.69 | 21.65 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...