Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSLBX
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLBX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$17.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.51M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.79
Change+$0.28 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.15B
HGXIX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.2B vs. HGXIX (330M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: HGXIX (0.87) vs RSLBX (0.06). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: HGXIX (9 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLBX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.11 vs. RSLBX (9.02). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 39.39 vs. RSLBX (9.01).
| HGXIX | RSLBX | HGXIX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.75 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.914 | 11.919 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330M | 82.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.06 | 1,550% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | 9.02 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.85 | 36.36 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.39 | 9.01 | 437% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement