Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXRX vs RSEBX
HGXRX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXRX vs RSEBX
Hartford Global Impact R3
Price$17.12
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.15M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$73.01
Change+$0.16 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.91B
HGXRX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXRX vs. RSEBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXRX is a Hold and RSEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.9B vs. HGXRX (325M). HGXRX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: HGXRX (0.40) vs RSEBX (0.23). HGXRX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: HGXRX (9 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). HGXRX (1.46) and RSEBX (1.45) have similar cost to investors . HGXRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). HGXRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: HGXRX (0) vs RSEBX (250). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.91 vs. HGXRX (9.38). HGXRX return over 5 years is better than : 37.40 vs. RSEBX (14.11).
| HGXRX | RSEBX | HGXRX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.45 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.45 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.912 | 12.311 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325M | 81.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.23 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.38 | 9.91 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.84 | 36.06 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.40 | 14.11 | 265% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.67 | - |