Ad is loading...
HGXRX vs RSLBX
HGXRX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts HGXRX vs RSLBX
Hartford Global Impact R3
Price$15.12
Change+$0.27 (+1.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.13M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$53.69
Change+$0.94 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.94B
HGXRX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXRX vs. RSLBX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXRX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 67.9B vs. HGXRX (251M). HGXRX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: HGXRX (0.46) vs RSLBX (0.02). HGXRX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: HGXRX (8 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than HGXRX (1.48). HGXRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). HGXRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLBX: HGXRX (0) vs RSLBX (250). HGXRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.85 vs. RSLBX (-2.54). HGXRX return over 5 years is better than : 60.17 vs. RSLBX (21.65).
| HGXRX | RSLBX | HGXRX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.75 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.75 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.174 | -5.840 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 67.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.02 | 2,260% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | -2.54 | -270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.48 | -0.64 | -1,008% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.17 | 21.65 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...