Ad is loading...
HHCCX vs HMEAX
HHCCX vs HMEAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHCCX vs. HMEAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHCCX is a Buy and HMEAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMEAX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. HHCCX (94.9M). HMEAX pays higher dividends than HHCCX: HMEAX (4.84) vs HHCCX (0.00). HHCCX was incepted earlier than HMEAX: HHCCX (17 years) vs HMEAX (9 years). HHCCX (4.07) is less costly to investors than HMEAX (2.74). HHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. HMEAX (556.00). HHCCX (2500) and HMEAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.05 vs. HHCCX (0.94). HMEAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.08 vs. HHCCX (4.23).
| HHCCX | HMEAX | HHCCX / HMEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.38 | 2.49 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.07 | 2.74 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.199 | 1.371 | -87% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.9M | 1.05B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 4.84 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.94 | 5.05 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.19 | 13.39 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.23 | 18.08 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers