Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHCZX vs HMEAX
HHCZX vs HMEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHCZX vs. HMEAX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHCZX is a Hold and HMEAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMEAX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. HHCZX (86.5M). HMEAX pays higher dividends than HHCZX: HMEAX (4.83) vs HHCZX (0.55). HHCZX was incepted earlier than HMEAX: HHCZX (17 years) vs HMEAX (9 years). HHCZX (3.07) is less costly to investors than HMEAX (2.74). HHCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. HMEAX (556.00). HHCZX (2500) and HMEAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HHCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.71 vs. HMEAX (5.59). HMEAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.13 vs. HHCZX (4.85).
| HHCZX | HMEAX | HHCZX / HMEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 2.49 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.07 | 2.74 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.689 | 3.394 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.5M | 1.11B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 4.83 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.71 | 5.59 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.31 | 15.08 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.85 | 16.13 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement