Ad is loading...
HHCZX vs HMEAX
HHCZX vs HMEAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHCZX vs. HMEAX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHCZX is a Hold and HMEAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMEAX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. HHCZX (92M). HMEAX pays higher dividends than HHCZX: HMEAX (4.84) vs HHCZX (0.56). HHCZX was incepted earlier than HMEAX: HHCZX (17 years) vs HMEAX (9 years). HHCZX (3.07) is less costly to investors than HMEAX (2.74). HHCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. HMEAX (556.00). HHCZX (2500) and HMEAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.05 vs. HHCZX (2.19). HHCZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.27 vs. HMEAX (19.75).
| HHCZX | HMEAX | HHCZX / HMEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 2.49 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.07 | 2.74 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.914 | 1.318 | -69% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92M | 1.04B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 4.84 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.19 | 5.05 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.92 | 13.39 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.27 | 19.75 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...