Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHHCX vs RNWBX
HHHCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HHHCX vs RNWBX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq C
Price$18.27
Change+$0.14 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.76
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
HHHCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. HHHCX (5.56B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than HHHCX: RNWBX (0.13) vs HHHCX (0.04). HHHCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HHHCX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). HHHCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). HHHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHHCX: RNWBX (250) vs HHHCX (2000). HHHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.53 vs. RNWBX (6.60). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.82 vs. HHHCX (20.90).
| HHHCX | RNWBX | HHHCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.67 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.67 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.481 | 10.918 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.56B | 67.6B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.13 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | 6.60 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.17 | 21.12 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.90 | 24.82 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement