Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHHFX vs RNWBX
HHHFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HHHFX vs RNWBX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq F
Price$20.17
Change-$0.08 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.38
Change-$0.32 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
HHHFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHFX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. HHHFX (5.82B). HHHFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HHHFX (1.10) vs RNWBX (0.13). HHHFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HHHFX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HHHFX (0.96). HHHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHHFX: RNWBX (250) vs HHHFX (1000000). HHHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.56 vs. RNWBX (11.39). HHHFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.19 vs. RNWBX (17.80).
| HHHFX | RNWBX | HHHFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.67 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.67 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.988 | 17.444 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.82B | 71.8B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.13 | 876% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.56 | 11.39 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.91 | 36.75 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.19 | 17.80 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement