Ad is loading...
HHHFX vs RNWBX
HHHFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HHHFX vs RNWBX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq F
Price$17.63
Change+$0.06 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.42B
American Funds New World R2
Price$77.75
Change+$0.21 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.67B
HHHFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHFX vs. RNWBX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHFX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 63.7B vs. HHHFX (5.42B). HHHFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HHHFX (1.30) vs RNWBX (0.14). HHHFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HHHFX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HHHFX (0.96). HHHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHHFX: RNWBX (250) vs HHHFX (1000000). HHHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.85 vs. RNWBX (2.53). HHHFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.43 vs. RNWBX (32.71).
| HHHFX | RNWBX | HHHFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.67 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.67 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.843 | 5.710 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.42B | 63.7B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.14 | 912% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | 2.53 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.75 | 23.98 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.43 | 32.71 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers