Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHHFX vs RNWBX
HHHFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HHHFX vs RNWBX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq F
Price$18.48
Change-$0.26 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.86
Change-$1.00 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.74B
HHHFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHFX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.7B vs. HHHFX (5.56B). HHHFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HHHFX (1.24) vs RNWBX (0.13). HHHFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HHHFX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HHHFX (0.96). HHHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHHFX: RNWBX (250) vs HHHFX (1000000). HHHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.85 vs. RNWBX (7.09). HHHFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.89 vs. RNWBX (28.56).
| HHHFX | RNWBX | HHHFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.67 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.67 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.325 | 11.298 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.56B | 67.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.13 | 920% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.85 | 7.09 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.65 | 32.44 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.89 | 28.56 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers