Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHHSX vs RNWBX
HHHSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HHHSX vs RNWBX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq R4
Price$21.43
Change+$0.07 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.08B
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.16
Change+$0.16 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.99B
HHHSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHSX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 73B vs. HHHSX (6.08B). HHHSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HHHSX (0.76) vs RNWBX (0.13). HHHSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HHHSX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HHHSX (1.36). HHHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). HHHSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: HHHSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). HHHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.31 vs. RNWBX (15.57). HHHSX return over 5 years is better than : 32.62 vs. RNWBX (25.99).
| HHHSX | RNWBX | HHHSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.058 | 21.224 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.08B | 73B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.13 | 605% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.31 | 15.57 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.17 | 42.56 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.62 | 25.99 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers