Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHHSX vs RNWBX
HHHSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HHHSX vs RNWBX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq R4
Price$19.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.40
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.85B
HHHSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHSX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69.8B vs. HHHSX (5.73B). HHHSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HHHSX (0.85) vs RNWBX (0.13). HHHSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HHHSX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HHHSX (1.36). HHHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). HHHSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: HHHSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). HHHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.87 vs. RNWBX (10.29). HHHSX return over 5 years is better than : 32.39 vs. RNWBX (30.44).
| HHHSX | RNWBX | HHHSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.808 | 14.752 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.73B | 69.8B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.13 | 635% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.87 | 10.29 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.61 | 34.52 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.39 | 30.44 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement