Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHHSX vs RNWBX
HHHSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HHHSX vs RNWBX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq R4
Price$17.94
Change-$0.23 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.47B
American Funds New World R2
Price$80.35
Change-$0.38 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.46B
HHHSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHSX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 66.5B vs. HHHSX (5.47B). HHHSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HHHSX (0.85) vs RNWBX (0.13). HHHSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HHHSX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HHHSX (1.36). HHHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). HHHSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: HHHSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). HHHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. RNWBX (6.26). HHHSX (31.48) and RNWBX (30.88) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HHHSX | RNWBX | HHHSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.554 | 9.245 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.47B | 66.5B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.13 | 635% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.12 | 6.26 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.94 | 19.67 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.48 | 30.88 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers